Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[Reiyuki]

Mike, interesting transformer theory.  Never completely understood the whole saturation thing.
      Couple questions left:
- Have you tried testing loads on your setup yet?  Maybe a 60w Incandescent through a power transformer or something, just to see some raw output.  I wonder if an OU in your setup is workable given that the tiny gap is where all the action is rather than the whole rod.  I'm also curious to find out what kind of voltage+current levels a small transformer might give you compared to UncleFester.
(With UncleFester's old setups generating almost a kilovolt, a low-turn transformer might be a good idea.)

- Were your pulse results AC or DC?  And if DC, was it dependent on B-Field polarity?
      (It would be strange to get AC pulses when it is biased with DC current, ya?)


As for my experiment coming up (Tesla style one), I'm not too concerned about runaway.  I figure, if I can actually smoke a 300w toroid with pulses coming from a 100w supply, the 25$ transformer is an 'acceptable loss'.
  'Slightly mad science' for sure, but it's still cheaper than an Oscilloscope or IGBT.

[sparks]

     The plazma condensation in the spark gap formed by the two carbon electrodes is going to convey it's eminformation through the carbon dielectric field and result in a non-radiant magnetic signature.  Unlike metal electrodes whose magnetic polarization effects the spark gap plazma frequency,  the carbon will convey the plazma information of the spark gap as change in resistance to the flow of energy density information. This directly effects the energy flow from the scource to the gap.  The gap forms a plazma field which becomes superconducting which "heats" the carbon whose resistance is lowered which condenses more plazma etc.  Lots of energy information from the scource heading for the gap real fast.  This is great if you are after a fusion process but not so good for regular em energy transfer.   The metal coating of the carbon results in formation of a junction zone not unlike a mosfet.  The energy density information (or intrinsic voltage) of the carbon field now able to effect a metal mass field.  The metal mass issues a unique polarization of the ambient energy field or magnetic flux signature.
This magnetic field now effects the scource to gap energy information flow and hf oscillation within the carbon field and the spark gap are initiated.  As this oscillation increases to energy levels of higher and higher amplitude and frequency something is gonna give.  Radioactive decay of the mass field? 

[mikewatson]

@mikewatson
I don't know why no one else has mentioned this point, at least I don't remember reading it.
But making an air gap in a toroid sounds very useful in another way.
A toroid could be cut completely in half to get 2 air gaps.
Then each half could be wound to whatever number of turns one wants.
This would make it much easier to wind a toroid then trying to pass the wire through
the center each time.
Does it mater if there are 2 air gaps 180 deg. apart?

2 airgaps are perfectly acceptable and do not make any significant difference. They should be kept small though, say of the order of a millimeter each.

Mike

[mikewatson]

don't know why no one else has mentioned this point, at least I don't remember reading it.
But making an air gap in a toroid sounds very useful in another way.
A toroid could be cut completely in half to get 2 air gaps.
Then each half could be wound to whatever number of turns one wants.
This would make it much easier to wind a toroid then trying to pass the wire through
the center each time.
Does it mater if there are 2 air gaps 180 deg. apart?

Reiyuki,

All my tests are DC single pulses of defined energy. I am trying to establish whether there is anything in the VSG idea and even if not is there any unaccounted for extra energy. There does seem to be some extra energy produced, not as much as Naudin claimed, but because of the current transformer hassle I cannot trust his results at present.
I do not know whether Naudin reset his current transformer, I have not seen any mention of it in his write-up. I could kick myself for not seeing the necessity for current transformer reset sooner, my excuse is that I was lulled into a sense of false secuity by Naudin's report taking it at face value and not looking at it  critically. Most of my previous tests are  generally still valid ( luckily) with the exception of current flow values calculated from the current transformer ratio, nevertheless they will have to be done again.

Without a load the ouput of a current transformer can reach kilovolts. If you have 1 turn primary with say 100 volts from the capacitors and the secondary of the current transformer has 500 turns then the voltage there is 50,000 volts with no load.  Of course the insulation breaks down. 

Regarding the use of AC, yes it should should work. If all this is right you should get current gain from an AC carbon arc. Like I mentioned before a carbon arc has negative resistance which was used to excite tuned circuits 80 years ago, the negative resistance keeping the circuit oscillating. DC power was supplied of course but the negative resistance of the carbon arc maintained the (RF) oscillation. If the arc were OU then it should maintain oscillation without any input power.

Mike

[mikewatson]

     The plazma condensation in the spark gap formed by the two carbon electrodes is going to convey it's eminformation through the carbon dielectric field and result in a non-radiant magnetic signature.  Unlike metal electrodes whose magnetic polarization effects the spark gap plazma frequency,  the carbon will convey the plazma information of the spark gap as change in resistance to the flow of energy density information. This directly effects the energy flow from the scource to the gap.  The gap forms a plazma field which becomes superconducting which "heats" the carbon whose resistance is lowered which condenses more plazma etc.  Lots of energy information from the scource heading for the gap real fast.  This is great if you are after a fusion process but not so good for regular em energy transfer.   The metal coating of the carbon results in formation of a junction zone not unlike a mosfet.  The energy density information (or intrinsic voltage) of the carbon field now able to effect a metal mass field.  The metal mass issues a unique polarization of the ambient energy field or magnetic flux signature.
This magnetic field now effects the scource to gap energy information flow and hf oscillation within the carbon field and the spark gap are initiated.  As this oscillation increases to energy levels of higher and higher amplitude and frequency something is gonna give.  Radioactive decay of the mass field? 

Sparks,
I accept that information in some form is being transmitted into the carbon from the spark. The spark certainly shows negative resistance but I have no evidence for superconductivity, this does not mean it is not so only I have no evidence for it.
The reverse or extra energy effect which I have seen (if it turns out to be real and not due to some unforseen circuit quirk) works with two carbons and no metal-carbon junction, nevertheless, certainly the energy density in the carbon arc is huge. I am reminded of Joe Champion's claims of being able to produce nuclear transformations with a carbon arc, also if I remember correctly Prof. Bockriss did something similar which of course went down like a lead balloon in the academic world. There is a lot to be discovered in this area, it seems to me from Champion, Bockriss and also Kervan's bilogical transmutation and also from these carbon experiments, that nature has another method of producing nuclear transformations conserving the energy internally without the dangerous radiation seen in conventional nuclear reactions. It seems to me  this conservation process must involve some sort of information transfer.

Mike