Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[sparks]

@Alecks

         The laws of energy still will stand no matter what theory goes down or up the drain.  Energy is either here like this or here like that.  Charge is intelligence.  Everything else is time.  There is no spacetime continuom because there is no space.

@Fenyman

       Sorry for barging in on your classroom but you had a very bright student here I needed to talk to.

[aleks]

Energy is either here like this or here like that.

Well, if you look deeper there is no energy at all - only static field configurations (I suspect that RF is just a stream of "whirl-like" elementary formations which are equal-spaced and the space between them affects perceived power spectrum). The true laws of interactions of these fields is what gives us an illusion of existence of energy. I'm, being an IT (and DSP) specialist, would say that there is only field of information available in this world. After all, you can't see energy - you can only attribute it to something you see. So, for a given static field configuration dynamic outcome is pre-defined. Of course, if you are dealing with billions of particles you have to use probability generalizations. But it's a bit unsolid to derive physical laws from probability generalizations. It's like judging how people in a society interact between each other based on general statistics: you'll never know how really they interact.

One fact was mentioned to me once - some scientists in Germany conducted deep-vacuum tests. What they've revealed was that particles are born out of nowhere (I think those were hydrogen, but I may be mistaken on that).

[allcanadian]

@inventor81
I am sorry to hear you are leaving, I valued your insights as much as anyone else here. I don't think we can ignore the work done by others in relevant fields just because it doesn't fit into our reality of what may be happening, we need to hear everyones perspective.

@aleks
I have would agree with your insights 100%, If you read the works of Tesla, Moray, Russel, Schappeller and others it becomes clear all forces and the effects of these forces are electrostatic in nature. Amphere himself concluded as much----that the magnetic field as we call it is electric in nature and was mislabelled as being a distinct field. We must see past the illusions of effect and examine cause and there we will find only electrostatic forces, maybe what Moray refered to as cold plasma.

More experiments last night with mixed results, most would confirm inventor81's thoughts of no Beta. I did some research on carbon and found carbon can be paramagnetic, ferromagnetic or diamagnetic depending on the amount of graphite present ie... the amount of heat applied during or after proccessing, which could apply to the heat of compression during proccessing. I had thoughts that the qualities of the carbon rod could be at the threshhold between diamagnetism/ferromagnetism producing no net interaction with the B field, or a one way interaction,I found however that a voltage can be induced in the carbon rod I am using.
My experiments confirmed that capacitive discharges or DC applied directlty to the carbon rod/copper input wire interface produce oscillations above 25MHz in the collector coil at the potential determined by the collectors turns ratio.
I have come to believe we may have it all wrong , the potential induced in the toroid or collector coils may be EM induction, EM induction has one requirement and that is a changing magnetic field. The PM field or windings on the carbon rod are essentially static fields so in order to perform work(EM induction) these fields must be moved somehow. I find nothing out of the ordinary in this device other than the carbon rod so I must assume the carbon rod has properties or qualities not considered, as Karl Schappeller once put it " We can only utilize what was already present and available for use". If we examine what others have done here in the forum it can be seen that a relatively high potential impulse is sent through the carbon rod and we have measured the effects but still we have no indication as to the nature of these effects, that is the forces that produce the transition from a static magnetic field to a mobile one. One clue may be the oscillations measured in the collector coils, the plasma discharge at the carbon/copper input wire interface produces oscillations near 25Mhz so the plasma essentially "is" the oscillator, as DC current is input and has no apparent oscillations in itself. In this case the plasma and DC source must have performed the "work" necessary to produce change(oscillations) in the static magnetic field thus inducing a voltage and current in the collector coils. Tonight I hope to map the collector frequency versus electrode pressure on the carbon rod to determine the extent to which the carbon/input electrode interface acts in determining frequency as well as using pulsed DC. Another option I believe is very relavent is using a DC coil "on" the carbon rod versus a PM field, this would seem to be a critical point if my guess is right.
I'll keep you posted

[Feynman]

@allcanadian

I did some research on carbon and found carbon can be paramagnetic, ferromagnetic or diamagnetic depending on the amount of graphite present ie... the amount of heat applied during or after proccessing, which could apply to the heat of compression during proccessing.

Thank you, this is a great piece of information.

I have come to believe we may have it all wrong Shocked , the potential induced in the toroid or collector coils may be EM induction,

I'm beginning to think this as well.

EM induction has one requirement and that is a changing magnetic field.

Right. And if we are creating an increasing EMF pulse through positive feedback, this could be what is inducing the 'extra' energy into the collector toroids.  Such a pulse also explains why we do not see significant amount of high energy beta rays (supposing K-capture is really the quantum level mechanism).

I find nothing out of the ordinary in this device other than the carbon rod so I must assume the carbon rod has properties or qualities not considered

I absolutely agree. 

If we examine what others have done here in the forum it can be seen that a relatively high potential impulse is sent through the carbon rod and we have measured the effects but still we have no indication as to the nature of these effects, that is the forces that produce the transition from a static magnetic field to a mobile one.

That about sums it up.  It's beginning to look like most of the 'beta' is actually EMI squelch which is what is tripping the counters. As R said, it is certainly not 1seivert. There is probably a bit of beta production going on.  But not like we were thinking before.   The extra energy in the discharge impulse is the key here, and I think alot of what we once thought was 'beta' may be somehow getting converted to extra current and magnetic impulse.

[AbbaRue]

Hoker belgian scientist
Were did he come from?
You're telling me that someone else has had results with a similar setup back in the 1970's?
I would like to read more on his setup as well, were did you find this info?
I didn't know glass could stop beta, a glass window would be easier to see through then 1/4 inch of aluminum,
unless it was transparent aluminum. Are you sure it's not lead crystal they are using?

@ Uncle.
When you got the run away, what voltage were you using and what capacitance value?
I bought some 1500 watt zener diodes at 28 volts, if I connect 2 in series do I get a 56 volt zener.
I guess I could check it myself but the idea may be useful here,
connecting enough of them in series to make a voltage regulator to contain the runaway.
Another thought is using a varistor, at about 250 volts to keep the voltage controlled.

I'm still looking for a good schematic to build a varible pulse generator,
I want one that only sends a single pulse and then shuts down.
I remember seeing one used for zapping coils to shrink coins somewhere but can't remember were.