9/11 truth movement topic

[Dingus Mungus]

Great links Pese!
Lots of sourcing...

[pese]

Great links Pese!
Lots of sourcing...

thank you for the "notice"  for my links,

so i remeber , that this "work" is usefull for others
that search for "knowledge and sources"
see also:

www.pese.150m.com/li.htm

engl. and germ. alternative "daily" NEWS

G.Pese

[ring_theory]

I don't know how to say "office materials have low energy density" any clearer.
I don't know how to say "jet fuels max burning temp is 900 celcius" any clearer.

maybe a couple of office items have a low energy density but a couple floors worth of office items would definately burn hotter than expected.
900c sure makes a good fire starter when distributed as it was. 

Your missing the point still...

None of those items will burn hotter than the fuel, and the fuel won't burn hot enough to melt the steel. Please show me proof of otherwise! Airation of fuel (wood, paper, fuel) will allow it oxidize more readily untill it reaches its max temp. Nothing in the building (exept the explosives) could burn hot enough to sever steel coloumbs, or created pools of liquid iron. The energy needed is simply not there. You keep stating that it is, but offer no proof. Show me one link that confirms that office supplies can burn at the 1600 celcius needed to liquify iron. Show me one proof of concept.

~Dingus Mungus

I'm done here! Believe whatever you want, however the end result is promoting anarchy and supporting terrorism and in my eyes is the highest form of treason. That detracts from the good that could be done here. I'll not be a part of it!   

[Dingus Mungus]

I don't know how to say "office materials have low energy density" any clearer.
I don't know how to say "jet fuels max burning temp is 900 celcius" any clearer.

maybe a couple of office items have a low energy density but a couple floors worth of office items would definately burn hotter than expected.
900c sure makes a good fire starter when distributed as it was. 

Your missing the point still...

None of those items will burn hotter than the fuel, and the fuel won't burn hot enough to melt the steel. Please show me proof of otherwise! Airation of fuel (wood, paper, fuel) will allow it oxidize more readily untill it reaches its max temp. Nothing in the building (exept the explosives) could burn hot enough to sever steel coloumbs, or created pools of liquid iron. The energy needed is simply not there. You keep stating that it is, but offer no proof. Show me one link that confirms that office supplies can burn at the 1600 celcius needed to liquify iron. Show me one proof of concept.

~Dingus Mungus

I'm done here! Believe whatever you want, however the end result is promoting anarchy and supporting terrorism and in my eyes is the highest form of treason. That detracts from the good that could be done here. I'll not be a part of it!   

TRANSLATION:
"Dingus you make good points that I can not disproove, but if I were to acknowledge this "anarchy" will happen."

Do you think the american revolution was "anarchy", what about the civil war? How is fighting against corruption "anarchy"? What makes my observations treason? You can't proove them wrong try as you might. Dick Cheney did buisness in Iraq and Iran during our sanctions in the 90's. Is that not treason??? Of course treason is defined as "knowingly helping an enemy in a time of war" or "working against your own country". So I can see how you would misuse the definition... I'm not commiting treason because my intent is aimed at the people responcible and not our form of government or our citizens. Now the administration on the othere hand: Allowed the Bin Ladens to fly out of US while all planes were grounded, commited our troops in a fiat war for profit against the enemies of our enemies, butchered the constitution in the name of security and extended exectutive powers, and over budgeted our nation so that we have hit 9 trillion in debt which is nearly double the highest previous recorder value. YET HERE YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT MY OPINIONS AND OBSERVATIONS... Why don't you look at the ACTIONS of the men you are defending.

~Dingus Mungus

WAKE THE FUCK UP!

[Dingus Mungus]

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/744529/9_11_new_collapse_footage_rare_demo_clearly_seen/

Watch it again ring... The floor "collapse" outruns the falling debry for over 10 floors.
Turning whole floors to dust faster than a chunk of concrete can fall through the air.

You can't explain these things away!

~Dingus Mungus

EDIT: My questions should not be this tough... It's your words and assertions that my questions are based on. As long as you weren't making it up as went along, you should have a source for each of my retorts. I can't stop you from ignoring the thread and the truth, but just know I will repost these questions everytime you return.