9/11 truth movement topic

[Dingus Mungus]

Dingus Collapse and fall times may compare to a avalanche or landslide, mud flow, etc in nature. What we think may be a sturdy non giving structure offers little or no resistance to such masses in a combined energy release as such.

For the floors that would make perfect sense, but the central columbs were made to be quite resistive. Unimaginably resistive. Yet the central core fell before the floors.

The other issue you refuse to concede to. Jneko offered a couple links supporting their opinion and findings. Did you even click on the links?

I did and have in the past before his post. The momentum theory is hogwash as seismic data, while denyed as a good measurement, it was never explained why. The spike times line up with video evidence, and air and materials require converting energy when they are compressed or turned in to 3 feet of dust... The fall times are way to fast for any gravity only powered colapse.

Then he asked me why WTC 7 is special if the prior explanation worked for the towers, and the answer is wtc7 was floor by floor from the bottom, not like the other towers. Several demo experts have come foreward saying WTC looks exactly like CD, times, looks, dust, metalurgical samples. Lots of evidence. Now, there are lots of implosion and building failure videos out there. Find me one example of a building failing like any of the WTC buildings.

Oh yeah i love that you offered another political distraction to the thread.  another politition offering what the people want to hear. YEAH VOTE FOR THAT GUY HE KNOWS WHAT WE WANT! There is definitely something wrong with that picture.

Hes been advocating the same political stance for 10 congressional terms, and is known as "Dr No" in congress, because he Nays anything unconstitutional. Go figure...

So how is that telling people what they want to hear???
(edit: rhetorical question... Don't reply to me.)

Now that I've replied to all your points...

::slaps own forehead::



Can people no longer post msg's to me in here? Pretty please? PM me if you want to discuss something, but I do not wish to get sucked back in to this never ending uber depressing debate. Its simply not worth the huge investment of time right now. Other important things are happening right now. Things just as bad, but more urgent. NAU, Iran, millitary commissions act, Gonzo, Cheney... I'm kinda busy trying to do other stuff.

~Dingus Mungus

No more @ dingus repies fellas

[JNeko]

You got it Dingus. Thank you for your replies. I see now about the difference b/w #7 and the twin towers. haha, the reason you get so many questions directed toward you is because you are one of the few on the forum (and on the web IMO) that will come back with a sensible answer and usually take the time to explain yourself, and not just like f the bush nazi or you think the government did this? WTFOMGBBQ!!11

Well, I have not found my stance in all this yet, still looking at some rebuttals, I will PM you if I have anymore questions. You can answer them at your leisure. No rush.

Thanks again.

J

[FAR]

Hi,

I joined this forum to find out more about Tesla and after watching some of those Steve Mark TPU videos over at youtube.

Unfortunately, this forum isn't FAR friendly. One could use some instructions aimed towards women, children and pets.

Any how, I just wanted to ask if any of you have seen this video where the author (Christopher A Brown) claims that there was NO STEEL CORE in the twin towers. 2 parts. Aimed towards the engineer type.

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-6240504594075547308&hl=en

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-5255701680091399090&hl=en

[Dingus Mungus]

Prof. Steven Jones - Another analysis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fylcf5Ky1X8

NIST attempt at yellow orange molten metal...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQdkyaO56OY

[d3adp00l]

Guys this whole thing goes so far beyond bringing the buildings down, and a war and everything else. As columbo used to do to solve a crime, look for what was there but is now missing, look for what wasn't there but now is, find who could have put it there, and who has what is missing and you find the main parties.