Faraday's Paradox, magnetism, and my first Post...

[TechStuf]

Fields and field lines have no more reality than the isobars on a weather map or the lines of longitude on a globe of the Earth.

Or the twenty thousand million dollars spent on the LHC to find the 'God particle'.  Relativity can be a real hypothetical pain the collective arse.  Especially when so much is expended to search for so little, while ignoring so much more.


The real crux of the matter is...(punny enough), the matter of the Crux.


http://www.discovery.org/a/3059

[Gwandau]

audiomaker,

TK is partly correct, I'm afraid, but far from fully correct.

As far as am concerned, all our so called forces are but secondary responses to an all encompassing underlying time field accceleration being responsible not only for all observable forces, but matter and space as well.

Contemporary science still doesn't know what electromagnetism is, and fails to give a satisfactory explanation why a magnet creates attraction, and a fully probable theory among other theories is that magnets are not themselves the very origin of their attractive and repulsive qualities, but merely acting as a sort of lens refracting the underlying field, where the appearance of attraction and repulsion is caused by a decrease or increase of space itself, affecting the curvature of space between the poles of the two magnets.

If one could create the same magnetic polar unequilibrium as is done in an ordinary electric motor by creating a field vector imbalance in the geometry around a permanent magnet, one would be able to create torque by same means as in an ordinary electric motor.

The very heart of the scientfic outlook is to always question everything and never stop trying to gain a better perspective of reality and if neccessary even revise the definition of our so called fundamental physical laws when possible.

Never say never.


TechStuf,

great article you linked to, there are a couple of lines in the article that really caught my attention, since it strongly indicates that there actually are scientifically valid extant prof of life on earth being the product of design.Since it does not fit into this thread, I'll post it in the correct one.

Cheers,

Gwandau

[audiomaker]

audiomaker,


As far as am concerned, all our so called forces are but secondary responses to an all encompassing underlying time field accceleration being responsible not only for all observable forces, but matter and space as well.

Contemporary science still doesn't know what electromagnetism is, and fails to give a satisfactory explanation why a magnet creates attraction, and a fully probable theory among other theories is that magnets are not themselves the very origin of their attractive and repulsive qualities, but merely acting as a sort of lens refracting the underlying field, where the appearance of attraction and repulsion is caused by a decrease or increase of space itself, affecting the curvature of space between the poles of the two magnets.

<snip>


Gwandau

Yes, that is pretty much what I was trying to say.  I suppose there are numerous variations of what I was calling "exposure", or "dilution of matter".  The lens example is an interesting one...bringing the other "layer" of space into focus.  Also, one has to define "space", and I think we are talking about the "space" that exists between space.
You could call it "The entity which exerts the actions of what is commonly referred to as "magnetic force" on observable mass", although I like TK's "Spooky action at a distance" analogy

Anyway, I just had this lightbulb go on.  I guess it's not a new lightbulb.  It's just one of those things where you are thinking about something else and suddenly you go "Oh...wait.. !!!"

It will have a bearing on some of my pursuits in the future, if I choose to pursue them, and for that... I'm happy.

Cheers!