1850 Watts free energy power ? New GEGENE circuit by JL Naudin shows COP = 2.8

[Magluvin]

Why not add another Bifilar Coil on top, so there are TWO of them.

It seems logical that some of the radiation is sneaking past the coil
in the picture, so why not capture it with a SECOND Coil?

Even if the second coil only got another 20%, it's better than nothing.

Or, maybe 1 receiver coil on both sides of the transmitter coil?  I dont know if one will take away from the other.

Mags

[broli]

So Naudin did some measurements with a DSO and I must say at first sight things certainly do seem interesting. The scope reveals, as questioned by some, a non sinusoidal waveform meaning a scope/DSO is an unmissable asset if you want to argue about power output. Since he didn't share the test data and I wanted to know if the average power output he found of 1812W was indeed calculated correctly, I went and did a simple visual integral/mean calculation myself on the shown image he posted.
Basically I calculate the area under the power output graph in pixels and divided it by the length also in pixels, then this value is normalized using the height of the original graph. The mean value I obtained after this process was 1835W, this is very near to his value so we can safely assume he calculated it correctly.

Edit: I just noticed he indeed DID share the data.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/gegene/gegene06en.htm

[Vito PL]

@ all
I looked it up much earlier: D
it works
but we do not use the full potential of this design.
Displacement curent is wasted.
The new year will be exciting.
Vito

[scianto]

I updated the video test mentioned earlier:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JSvSFugWwI
with English subtitles (you may need to switch them on).

[broli]

That video is quite interesting and perhaps even very important. It shows that the measured voltage has also a 50Hz component, due to the mains, when you "zoom out". If this is also present in Naudin's setup then it changes the data entirely and thus also the calculations.