Is this the Smith/Kapanadze secret ?

[Belfior]

A capacitor is not a magnetic device. You only need voltage to charge it and some amps to take care of the internal resistance.

Then you use the charge in the caps by what ever means to power a load. Like if you got 9000V in the cap bank you pulse it through a spark gap to a trafo and get it down to 230V. Or if the freq is off then down to 12V and DC with a FWBR.

Why do you need a schematic for this?

[AlienGrey]

A capacitor is not a magnetic device. You only need voltage to charge it and some amps to take care of the internal resistance.

Then you use the charge in the caps by what ever means to power a load. Like if you got 9000V in the cap bank you pulse it through a spark gap to a trafo and get it down to 230V. Or if the freq is off then down to 12V and DC with a FWBR.

Why do you need a schematic for this?

is it a secret ? if a cap is charging it's got inductance by nature of it's construction and also resistance so it creates a magnetic field as pulse as it charges!

[Belfior]

it seems to be an open secret and the only way to hide it. Voltage we can create and voltage is what the cap takes in, but then it can output charge which is amperage when it is spent over time.

Resistance is always a problem and other ways we lose charge like a spark gap. We need to work around these problems.

Impedance disappears with reactance if the pickup coil and the cap are in resonance. You could also AV plug into the cap so the cap only sees DC.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI5XWz8aZvo

If all that fails then we move on. How about using the L2's lower end to a cap leg and high end to another caps leg? Then you got the coil's potential stored in a cap with potential difference between them

I think the whole point of all these kachers and grenade coils is to fool people to think it is something mystical. Energy stored in a cap is (CV^2)/2. Farads and volts. No current there in the equation.

[apecore]

it seems to be an open secret and the only way to hide it. Voltage we can create and voltage is what the cap takes in, but then it can output charge which is amperage when it is spent over time.

Resistance is always a problem and other ways we lose charge like a spark gap. We need to work around these problems.

Impedance disappears with reactance if the pickup coil and the cap are in resonance. You could also AV plug into the cap so the cap only sees DC.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI5XWz8aZvo

If all that fails then we move on. How about using the L2's lower end to a cap leg and high end to another caps leg? Then you got the coil's potential stored in a cap with potential difference between them

I think the whole point of all these kachers and grenade coils is to fool people to think it is something mystical. Energy stored in a cap is (CV^2)/2. Farads and volts. No current there in the equation.

Belfior,
I like your approach...real eye opener... very usefull comment.
In fact two caps..each side of the grenade... sounds good.

Greetings

[Belfior]

I do not claim that I am right. I am just saying that we need new ways of looking into this stuff. You are not going to find anything useful by reading something published by jpmorgans and what ever to energy industry is lobbying. They pay for books and education, but they control what is taught in the schools.

Darsonval had a transformer that produced low volts and more amperage. The guy was hard to find, because he has been almost wiped from history. Attaching a pic of his coil system.

Interestingly Darsonval also used caps there.

There is like 20 lines on the guy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques-Ars%C3%A8ne_d%27Arsonval

So one approach would be to create high potential difference with HV that will excite electrons not already in the circuit. The stuff that scientists say is there. The ambient energy. Then provide easy access to a pool of electrons like the ground. Put the load in between or store the energy in caps.

I feel that the answer is something simple. Something overlooked. We are just being misguided by people that try to pull us towards theory and complex devices