Free Solid State/mechanical energy

[nat1971a]

so it appears multiples of 12 produces harmonics

12,24,144,432 etc

[bocas]

Here's my take on the numbers. Sweet sixteen are the 7 tones or elements in the octave which Erfinder says is 3240 Hz.  I haven't figured out the difference between 16 x 16 and 24 x 24 yet.

[barbosi]

I have two words: Pi, Phi.
Pi is the transcedental number as I said in a previos post.
Phi is the link with our dimensional world. Nature builds all with respect to this number. If there are numbers with certain "power", those numbers are Fibonacci numbers. Fibonacci series is F(N)=F(N-1)+F(N-2), in other words, each Fibonacci number is the sum of the two previous ones: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ..., 144, etc.
The Fibonacci numbers and relation with Phi: F(n)/F(n-1) -> Phi when N ->infinite.

With Pi and Phi we got the solution to the "squaring the circle" challenge.

On Phi music scales are created,human body and other living creatures as well, and is the base for arts including architecture (not in our modern times though).

Google for Phi and you'll find plenty of information along with wonderful aritmetic and geometric properties.

I have though my lack of understanding with the link between mathematics involving direct application in engineering. If I don't find the answer for myself, I'll ask here later.

EDIT: I forgot to mention 432[Hz] - square root of 186624[miles/s] - is musical note A or La which is used [to be] by orchestra to accord their instruments. It was mentioned before by Maximumgravity1, but I thought to remind about it, because it is considered a "special" note in the spectrum. With any other note the accord (tunning) of instruments is considered hard to accomplish. Played at once by all instruments, any other note will sound dissonant. Not the case with A (La).

A pretty good website about phi is: http://goldennumber.net/

[barbosi]

All,

Here is what I found so far:

In nature it's all about Phi and proportions.
Using Phi and proportions of Phi = balance.

The design of Great Pyramid of Giza, Egypt, is based on Phi and later calculations based on physical dimensions shown that is a solution to ?squaring the circle?.

The Pyramid dimensions are like in attached picture, and ?squaring the circle? means the area of the Pyramid base (the square) is the same with the circle with diameter equal to the hight of Pyramid. And also it means the perimeter of the base is equal to circle's perimeter.

Image courtesy of http://www.goldennumber.net, Gary B. Meisner, Copyright 2006.
Warning: for anyone who intend to use material from this site please visit:
http://goldennumber.net/images.htm

I hope you know by now relationship between Phi and Fibonacci numbers.
If we consider from now Phi = 144 (Fibonacci number not the actual golden ratio; Phi is here just to match the picture notations) we get  Pyramid's height = 12. Also if we multiply all dimensions with 3 (still proportions hence balance), will get:

Phi X 3 = 432 (square root of light speed)
1 X 3 = 3 (which gives 6 inch diameter of rotor ?? and perimeter 6 X 4 = 24 number of poles on switch ??)
Sqrt(Phi) X 3 = 36 (...?...?... We got interpretation for the square but not for the circle yet...)

So far I didn't make any use of measure units, just playing with numbers.

However, while considering previous posts from Erfinder to get further, I got confused.

Formula Tesla used:
(speed of light) / (frequency of circuit) = (length of stationary wave) X ? = (length of secondary coil)

186624 / f = Lambda X  ? = 144

Lambda = 186624 / f
Lambda = 186624 / 3240 = 57.6 [miles]

Lambda X  ? = 57.6 X  ? = 14.4 [miles] -> It looks like 144 but not 144. If I consider 324 instead of 3240 (an ordinary typo), I get 144, but is still MILES not inch.

However:
14.4[miles] X 63360 = 912384 [inch] -> I'm lost!

And also I think there is a typo when Erfinder said 1 inch = 0.2272727 miles (with emphasis on repetition), In fact 1 inch = 0.002272727 miles (based on 1 mile = 63360 inch).

That's it for now, still out of phase why different mm measures for the same inch, but I hope also with your help to have some progress.

Regards.

[Maximumgravity1]

Well, I for one, am excited.  I think the begining is a good place to start, as I see too many peices with no understanding how they got there.  Thank you once again for you efforts and your patience.  It looks like the site is off to a good start, and I hope we can soon begin to lift the shroud and unravel the mystery...