strong evidence ( mathematic + physics ) we can build Perpetum

[tesla2]

Below real discovery physics not pseudophysics we have huge Gap in physics

this what You have here = argument for all people who like fight with universities
They are blind ( only people who try can win )


The principle of conservation of energy
...........................VS ................................
The principle of conservation of momentum

http://youtu.be/1HWsvZdMBek


Thank You for support all good people !

important pdf ( main drawing from Yotube)

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0BXW-xN6ewKbzU1a2ZWbjlYRXc/edit?usp=sharing


Please imangine balon inside rocket

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yne64IzUMWY/URhAEsd_LfI/AAAAAAAAApE/EV7b9rzsWSk/s1600/22.JPG

ONE PIPE + PERFECT DYNAMITE E [J]
TWO IDEAL THE SAME MASS "m"

or One balon and two mass m 


Water always go from mountains to sea ( not from sea to Mountains )

Mountain = high energy level

Sea = Lower Energy Level


m=m but mL = m R ?

( inertia - in one polish book - author used word resistance"

Other polish inventor Lucjan Łagiewka "

Mr Lucjan bumper ( 54 sec ) - http://youtu.be/4_5oseSVUc4

How it work how to stop car 50 kg own mass ... so short distance
without Inertia problem Glass

Mr Lucjan live close to my Home
" Maciej - Energy always go more easy there where feel lower resistance
- my bumper = lightning rod !!!

mL= sea
mR = mountains

HOW TO EASY EVALUATE ( Inventor = simple idea ) ?

Stationary point A in the Universe and mass m = 1 kg


A . m ------> Vo = 1m/s

1.> What mean one pipe and dynamit ?

2.> Energy. where is Sea level where is Mountain
- where is neutral line ?
.
3. > How to easy confirm on Earth different ( Left - Right )
..... - How to recognize direction mountains - sea = -------> Vo


point 1 > One pipe inside pipe we have one preasure !!!


fact a) the same forces
fact  the same time ( work time )

Fact a ) AND Fact  = > Force F time t (perfect symetric condition )


point 2 >

Ek= m*Vo*Vo/2 = 1kg * 1m/s *1m/s /2 = 1/2 [J]

question 1
How many energy I need to stop mass m ( respect to A point )?
Ek2 = 0 Ek1 = 1/2 [J]

1/2 [J] - to stop mass m I need 1/2 [J]

guestion 2
I have 1m/s I want to have 2m/s

how many energy I need to accelerate mass m from 1m/s to 2m/s

Ek2 =? Ek2= 1kg * 2m/s *2m/s /2 = 2[J] !!!


2[J] - 0,5 [J] = 1,5[J]

DO YOU SEE 1,5 [J] different ( Sea - mountains )


point 3 >

TWO OPPOSITE ROPES TEST

"*"- star shows hit direction



rope A *[-----------------]

-----------> (Vo Earth's speed in the universe)

rope B [-----------------]*


please use perfect twins hammers and hit at one time rope A and rope B

You will see that Hz A not equal Hz B ?

http://youtu.be/1R-_TZSmzqk

more info http://marosz2.blogspot.com/


PHOTOCAMERA AND BULB TEST

http://youtu.be/XF_npmQ8kGY

more info http://tesla2.blogsopt.com

ONE LASER TEST
http://tesla32.blogspot.com/


CLASSICAL MECHANIC Foucault pendulums

http://tesla8.blogspot.com/

[conradelektro]

@tesla2: As far as I can see from your videos, drawings and writings:

Your simple experiments with your camera at home could not confirm your theory?

Or am I mistaken?

Greetings, Conrad

[tesla2]

Sir please read below  step by step

think  and see how I compare light and water  last Ytube
( I'm 100 % sure why my camera can measure I have other problem - it is strange but nobody can be 100% sure what measure my camera - not exist person who is right now sure what is our velocity in the universe !!! we need  do more test  not in home but for example in LIGO )

below simple one balon test ( rocket - zero gravitation )

mass m - balon - mass m

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yne64IzUMWY/URhAEsd_LfI/AAAAAAAAApE/EV7b9rzsWSk/s1600/22.JPG


question a) how many energy will go to left and right mass m
Vo = 0 ( respect to stationary point A in the universe )

question b) how many energy will go to left and right mass m
Vo = 1 m/s ( respect to stationary point A in the universe )

if You want to keep mV = 0 you need give some energy to mass m L and m R
please make graph

please think that mass m L can slown down go to zero and accelerate
mass m right can only accelerate

after You finish please think where energy want to go more easy ?

how many energy You use for accelerate mass m how many for slown down

the principle of conservation of momentum  and question b)

(why You think that
more energy will go to mass m right ? why ? the same velocity change = not the same energy left right ? )

question c ) what is your opinion ? why balon will push mass m right more stronger ? ( only to keep the principle of conservation of momentum )

the same balon the same time the same preasure not the same work ?


how many energy You need to stop mass m left ( Vo=1 m/s )
how many energy You need to accelerate mass m right  (Vo=1m/s V end = 2m/s )

Can we recognize constant velocity Vo respect to A point inside widowless rocket ?

Yes / NoT ( where energy will go - what is reason that not symetry we have Vo??)

Do You know what right now is in all books
******************************************************
"  Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity. "
*****************************************************

Sir I'm person who done this what was impossible for physics 
Poland first home test :
http://youtu.be/XF_npmQ8kGY

what I realy done  ?  Why my camera measure  ( compare light and water )
http://youtu.be/LR_UvEFA7qI

more question

http://tesla256.blogspot.com

[tesla2]

My question how many water will go opposit to velocity Vo arrow ?
( kg , litres ) ?
why ? what is the reason ?

I have two the same mass m why  water will choise mass m that will slowdown ?

http://youtu.be/9DT5gWv6gs4

[conradelektro]

@tesla2: conventional science claims that your ideas and thought experiments have since long been answered. The only way to get some attention is a repeatable and conclusive experiment. All your theories are just talk till you can show a conclusive experiment, a real experiment not just talk and thought.

On this page http://tesla256.blogspot.co.at/ you say yourself about your digital camera experiment:

"( right now I don't know what I really measured, the universe is a huge space, my camera measures only locally )"

and this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9k-zidfJZg&feature=player_embedded is not conclusive because there are many possibilities why the spectra are different:

- temperature of the light source was different
- temperature of the charged coupled device in your digital camera was different
- the charged coupled device in your digital camera has a certain amount of unpredictable random noise

You have a chance of being heard in the scientific world if you can show a real experiment putting conventional science in doubt. Talk, theories and thought experiments will not be enough.

So, try to make your real experiment better and repeatable, document your results in a clear and concise way, and may be then people will listen.

I know that this is difficult and may even be not possible. Well, that is your task. Do the unexpected and people will listen.

Greetings, Conrad