Tesla's "COIL FOR ELECTRO-MAGNETS".

[jbignes5]

does anyone here see a switching device

Look at point G. Lower coil. It says suitable source of current.

In the second paragraph he tells of the source of currents.

"In endeavoring to adapt currents or discharges of very high tension to various valuable uses, as the distribution of energy through wires from central plants to distant places of consumption, or the transmission of powerful disturbances to great distances, through the natural or non-artificial media. I have encountered difficulties in confining considerable amounts of electricity to the conductors and preventing its leakage over their supports, or its escape into the ambient air, which always takes place when the electric surface density reaches a certain value."

Now lets look at his fix for leakage of higher voltage examples.

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-514,167-electrical-conductor

Do not connects this sheath to ground directly. Always go through an inductance or capacitance or do not connect it to ground at all.

Now back to this topic.

"In order to attain my object and to properly increase the capacity of any given coil, I wind it in such way as to secure a greater difference of potential between its adjacent turns or convolutions, and since the energy stored in the coil—considering the latter as a condenser, is proportionate to the square of the potential difference between its adjacent convolutions, it is evident that I may in this way secure by a proper disposition of these convolutions a greatly increased capacity for a given increase in potential difference between the turns."

This is and will be the only reason of this coil. I have never asserted that DC should be used in this coil. In fact AC and impulse currents would be the only beneficial currents to use. With Impulse currents not even looked at for this coil in the patent. I have never asserted that the proper resonance not be used in either case. Why one would be focusing on the non resonant condition to me would be so inefficient that it would be counter productive. In order to use impulse currents one needs to use the resonant condition. But as Tesla talks about in the first example "The Tower" you must bring the system slowly up to resonance and then hold it there. This increases the efficiency as it nears resonance and will stop excessive break down events.

My further experiments have always been in the AC/impulse direction. With very high frequencies for the AC/Bifilar coil and Impulse around the Bifilar coil as an Exciter.

This will be my direction that I am going in. If the two types of current AC/impulse is kept in synchronization it should have a Laser like amplification of the current exiting the bifilar coil.

As for other claims I will let others experiment on those claims. There is no point in "Debating" these claims because the debaters have not done the experiments. So they can not argue the validity with no proof. They can postulate till their hearts desire but it is only guessing at this point with no real evidence to the contrary.

As for the claims of increased magnetism it does make sense from the descriptions of the patent but this also comes with increased current and then a diminishing of that current over time. But I have not done the experiments to those claims so I can not say anything about those claims and it would bear little resemblance to reality without actually doing the experiments.

[sparks]

        You guys really don't have to go through all the trouble of building a T coil to understand it's operation.  Dollard's analogue computer is pretty much one.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BnCUBKgnnc

[jbignes5]

I would also like to comment about Eric's position on things. Eric has built devices on the subject of Tesla. But like in any other field those who do not understand the Technology or don't even care to build the actual devices will never understand the principles of those devices, they tend to destroy any attempt to build and show those principles. Eric has had many of labs and many many components stolen or destroyed by the ones in power. I can not refute such claims and tend to believe them because Eric has never, in all my days of investigating Tesla or the claims of Tesla and the work of eric, lied about anything in his videos.
Lets check this video out about a strange device which does two things. A: It establishes he has been replicating Tesla devices or methods. B: That others have gone to great lengths to destroy anything showing proof of those experiments. Except for some video's that he has saved.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtM6rJxs0uM

I am not claiming any validity to the claims yet. But again I will be looking into these claims at a later date.

[synchro1]

"I'm looking at testing the difference with my rotor. Will have the rotor set in a position and arrange the coils for 1 timed pulse and see how far around it goes for either regular or bifi coils. A pendulum would be interesting also. Have a magnet as the weight of the pen, and mount the coil to the base facing the resting magnet and see how far the pen moves on impulse."


This approach should pay off. "Moves on impulse"! That's the ticket. This test will vindicate everything I've been saying. The biflilar will outperform the single wire with it's stronger magnetic collapse field! 



 

[gyulasun]

The biflilar will outperform the single wire with it's stronger magnetic collapse field!

Honestly, I would be very pleased to see such result!

Gyula