Exploring the Inductive Resistor Heater

[MileHigh]

Do what you want with your circuit Gmeast but there is a salient point that I am not sure you are getting:  No matter what kind of heater circuit you are building, when you look at it from the battery terminals onward, it will be a 100% efficient heater.  You can change the design, change your operating frequency or do whatever you fancy, you will always get a design that is 100% efficient in producing heat.  You may as well as buy a big ceramic resistor, some heat sink compound, and a heat sink.  Connect your battery to that, no switching or MOSFET required, and you will have a 100% efficient heater.

[SeaMonkey]

I've conducted dozens of identical tests who's results justify the further exploration of a heater using an element possessing Inductive and Resistive characteristics.  I have no working theory, but I have consistent test results which I have attempted to share.

I share your interest and enthusiasm.
The circuit lends itself well to potential
enhancement with external inductance
(in addition to the heating element)
and high efficiency switching techniques.

[gmeast]

Do what you want with your circuit Gmeast but there is a salient point that I am not sure you are getting:  No matter what kind of heater circuit you are building, when you look at it from the battery terminals onward, it will be a 100% efficient heater.  You can change the design, change your operating frequency or do whatever you fancy, you will always get a design that is 100% efficient in producing heat.  You may as well as buy a big ceramic resistor, some heat sink compound, and a heat sink.  Connect your battery to that, no switching or MOSFET required, and you will have a 100% efficient heater.

As I said earlier, you have a mindset and are convinced of your conclusion. I have proven that additional  energy is entering the system to produce more heat for the energy consumed than should normally occur.


DO NOT POST HERE ANY MORE. Or go ahead and do so and waste your time. I'll not argue with you. You are wrong in you conclusion with respect to the anomalies I've observed, recorded and reproduced. I'll not be deterred in the least. Your guys' tactics are well recognized and it's becoming clear to more and more in this community that your are FOES of over unity performance technologies. These systems derive supplemental energy from alternative sources that are not easily measured. It's as simple as that.


I'll thank you to leave now.

[gmeast]

P.S.


If you are basing your conclusions on current theory alone, then there is NO basis for discussion because you have not built, tested and observed the anomalies yourself. If this is so, then you are ONLY an armchair engineer (or whatever you call yourself) and your conclusions are empty, invalid and without merit.

[gmeast]

I share your interest and enthusiasm.
The circuit lends itself well to potential
enhancement with external inductance
(in addition to the heating element)
and high efficiency switching techniques.

Thank you SeaMonkey!