Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Big try at gravity wheel

Started by nfeijo, May 03, 2013, 10:03:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

orbut 3000


It's the most advanced ideal ZED and the mathematical analysis is surprisingly simple.

MarkE

It is not a ZED.  It is an advanced design that outperforms all ZEDs, TAZs, etc.

MarkE

Quote from: webby1 on March 02, 2014, 08:19:10 AM
Been there done that MarkE, so I know some of this stuff that you are carrying on about NOT working DOES work,, go build one yourself.

How many times must I point out your error?

The flow rate of the mediums in the 2 vessels is not the same, that breaks your special case requirements.
Flow rate never enters into it.  The form of energy is everything in the problem.  As long as the form of energy remains in potential form, the losses are inevitable.
Quote

You can keep insisting on all sorts of things that are not present,, keep it up all you want,  but it was you who said a professional is supposed to do what when there error is pointed out?  and you are refusing to do what?  by your definition that means you are what?
You have not found an error on my part.  You keep waving your hands furiously trying to conceal your error.  It is up to you to show a mechanism that you have devised (and according to you that you have already used) that transfers the "air" without suffering the energy loss shown.  So far you've proposed a number of approaches that don't work.
Quote

Again with the cheat gravity?  really MarkE.  Huge losses,, my oh my,, are you hoping that if you keep saying that that it will make it real?  it won't make it real MarkE.
The gravity cheat is HER/Zydro's claim as the supposed basis for their claim of free energy.  Both claims are false.
Quote

Don't forget that by your description then a hydraulic jack takes twice the input energy than the work from the output,, after all that is 2 cylinders under pressure interacting,, directly even.
No webby that is your misunderstanding.  A hydraulic jack does not operate as your two cylinders in your set-up.

TinselKoala

Webby, I've been trying to find the photos you posted at one time, of your scale model sitting on your garden table. I am not sure whether MarkE has seen that photo.

Since it's the one Travis paid you for, perhaps MarkE would like to see it. I know I sure would like to see it again. Can you please re-post those pix?

And if you have another, more sophisticated scale model, please post pix of that one, too.
Thanks in advance,
--TK

TinselKoala

Thanks, Webby, those are the ones I was thinking of. I'm sure it will help MarkE to evaluate and understand what you've been telling him.