Big try at gravity wheel

[Marsing]

Déjà vu
secret of life,

[memoryman]

Mr. Travis, you wrote in a previous post "Our group has matured to realize that Energy Amplification and O/U are different things.
Energy amplification in the ZED can be shown in simple math - that deserves the term Super conservative.
O/U - which is defined by the puppet defense team is created energy - or energy from nothing.
Math is awesome - it separates the two, and a math error and correction - is learning.....".
Indeed, math is awesome. So, where is your math to show that OU is different from Energy Amplification? After all, amplification is making 'it' larger, which implies more than the original. So the end result would be a form of OU.
When can we see an actual device demonstrating without doubt that energy is multiplied? It has been 1.5 years since PESN posted their article.
Respectfully, memoryman (now posting as ngepro)

[mrwayne]

Mr. Travis, you wrote in a previous post "Our group has matured to realize that Energy Amplification and O/U are different things.

Indeed, math is awesome. So, where is your math to show that OU is different from Energy Amplification? After all, amplification is making 'it' larger, which implies more than the original. So the end result would be a form of OU.

When can we see an actual device demonstrating without doubt that energy is multiplied? It has been 1.5 years since PESN posted their article.
Respectfully, memoryman (now posting as ngepro)

Hello Sir,

First thank you.

Super conservative is the better term than amplification. Amplification does improperly describe or imply an increase.... which we do not do with our ZED system.

Our first system was a "10, 7, to 3 system" - which means Ideal of the system was 10, we re-used 7 to operate the system, and ended with 3 left over (from the 10).

Never any un accounted for energy in the system or coming from the system. a super conservative process which results in the input reduction.

Our out put comes from the difference between the production and the cost of the process.

We have reduced the cost below 20% of the output - so the output is 5 times the size of the cost. But not one bit of output is unaccounted for.

Of course we have optimized those designs and improved that ratio greatly.

............

The maturity came with the hard look at why we were feverishly treated, as if we had stolen from some great indisputable author.

We began to understand that it was an assumption by many that a free energy device "must not conform to physics". An assumption that is not correct.

That assumption also lent to the belief that a black box would be proof - and a closed loop would be proof.

Even Data - is ignored if it can not be explained.

.........

We matured to understand that a black box - did not end the questions - only increased them.

We matured to understand that a closed looped system - did not end the questions - only increased them.

We learned those lessons the hard way - at great personal expense.

Our Data collection system opened our minds.... because we were able to verifiy the MATH - without violating any simple physics.
.................

We are in the business to provide actual devices - we are well funded, by investors that sought us out.

As to this moment - we are two weeks from having our Alpha model of our Rotary TAZ completed.

.................

I posted on this web site - for two reasons - support thinkers - and to deny the bullies...


Thank you.

[conradelektro]

We have a new date from the Mr. Wayne:

"As to this moment - we are two weeks from having our Alpha model of our Rotary TAZ completed."

Two weeks would be the 21st of April, but let's say "end of April".


Will we be able to see and to measure the Rotary TAZ at the end of April?


Or is it a non verifiable promise? That would be the stile of the Mr. Wayne.

I wish that the Mr. Wayne would stop bull shitting everybody. It is a bit old after this many years.


Greetings, Conrad

[mrwayne]

We have a new date from the Mr. Wayne:

"As to this moment - we are two weeks from having our Alpha model of our Rotary TAZ completed."

Two weeks would be the 21st of April, but let's say "end of April".


Will we be able to see and to measure the Rotary TAZ at the end of April?


Or is it a non verifiable promise? That would be the stile of the Mr. Wayne.

I wish that the Mr. Wayne would stop bull shitting everybody. It is a bit old after this many years.


Greetings, Conrad

Lol, have you "actually read" all the bull and mud slinging over these years.....it does get old.
You made an incorrect assumption - our "Dates" are not for public display.
Sorry - We shared the ZED - which is "no bull."
Wayne