Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

@PW, .99, MH: I think it's pretty clear by now that Ainslie didn't even actually write the papers herself. Comparing her writing and expository style from what we see in these pages, with what is in the paper, one clearly sees that someone else wrote the paper. Perhaps under her guidance; certainly the cartoons depicting her idea of current flow are her own inimitable style. Particularly since they don't even have the mosfets shown as they are in the circuit!! She has the Q1 and Q2 gates connected together, their sources connected together, and their drains connected together, in the cartoons that explain how the circuit is supposed to work!

It is to laugh. The cartoons were made before her silly wiring error was discovered and explained, and she is so arrogant that she won't even correct the drawings but rather makes up some silly explanation for them.

So she doesn't know how to operate the apparatus, she doesn't know how to interpret the scope traces, she doesn't know the actual FG or scope settings, she doesn't know what is actually in the papers, she doesn't know how to calculate energy, or even the difference between two numbers ...... but she knows she's right. Right.

[poynt99]

.

[TinselKoala]

What the good lady from the tip of Africa desires is attention. And one seems to give her just that.

Her circuit is the least important aspect of this strange story. Totally unimportant for her and as it seems also for her admirers and critics.

Greetings, Conrad

Not quite totally unimportant..... because the circuit gives one something to grab onto.

It is simple and not too expensive to construct and anyone who does construct it, or simulate it, discovers the same things about it, over and over and over.

Since Ainslie won't cooperate in performing correct and definitive tests of her silly claims, it is up to others to call her bluffs, confront her mendacity, and correct the misrepresentations that she has been putting over on people for well over a decade now. And the circuit itself is the tool with which we can do this.

There is nothing ambiguous about the circuit and its behaviour, and testing it reveals the truth. Even her former admirers at Energetic Forum finally discovered the truth, using the circuit itself.

[markdansie]

Thanks TK
I understand your not wanting to post which makes me sad. I will cut and paste thanks for that.
Many people wanted me to start a news or web page that did not declare everything as real, and to cover a broader range of topics.
I will not sensor posts, as you know everyone except MarkE has been banned on free energy news
I do hope people will post in the future
Mark

[TinselKoala]

Don't be sad, Mark.... just look at what she has posted! I really think you should put this on your site too, just under her "plea to academics", so that they can all see just how she responds to real substantive criticisms of her report.

Ainslie said,

And guys, YET ANOTHER -  also for our sweet little gherkin who uses a bastardised version of Nicola Tesla's name - to pretend to an equivalent genius.  God help us all - and who DENIES that he's actually Bryan Little.  But who does claim, notwithstanding, to have a unique GRE count standardised against the size of your average pickle. 

Hello my sweet 'ickle pickle'

SO, so much more.  And all of it more of the same.  But you're also beginning to sound increasingly desperate. Especially with your need to also ransack Glen Lettenmaier's archives.  They reach just as deep into your own agenda.  And - sadly they're just as inappropriate. 

I understand from Professor Khan that Glen wrote to him explaining that he was an owner/moderator of Energetic forum.  Which is a bit of a porkie pie.  And.  Had he known that Glen was just 'Glen' - so to speak - he would not have bothered to answer him.  Perhaps the trick is for you, yourself, to write to Professor Khan - and establish the 'truth' about this matter.  Perhaps, at it's least, he'll take the trouble to answer you.  I know that I would.  Especially when I see how READY you are to PUBLISH PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE.  It speaks to the very real evidence that you are ENTIRELY UNTRAMMELED BY MATTERS OF PRINCIPLE.  I think, in your case, that's probably a genetic attribute  - and increasingly more evident on these forums.   

Anyway.  That's NOT what I want to write about.  It's an ENTIRELY different issue.   I have a tip for you.  We all KNOW that you're somewhat vertically challenged.  WELL  Here's a thought.  Try your hand at telling the truth.  Because that way - no matter how LITTLE you are - it will give us all the general impression that you're actually quite BIG.  How about it ... my sweet little pickle?  It might just work?

Anyway - I'll leave the thought with you - while you 'slink under a rock' as you put it with your 'tail' up - or down - or anywhere in front or behind you.  I just earnestly hope and pray that the space under that rock can accommodate your GRE count.  Take really good care of it.  It's something of a national and global treasure.

With as much as ever of my regard that I can still manage now that I'm so very, very old,
Rosie Pose.

Let Ains-lie speak for herself.

Every time she refers to "Brian (or Bryan) Little", or refers to a pickle or the letters GRE, she reveals her abysmal ignorance, amazing arrogance and utter stupidity. She has been told over and over how wrong she is, and she cannot present a single shred of evidence supporting her contention that I am someone with that name. Yet she persists in her insanity. The world should see this in its entirety. Whenever she makes her polite-sounding pleas to academics, they should be published right alongside the innumerable examples of this kind of crap that she spews.

Ainslie should also realize that when a recipient of an email decides to share it by posting it on the internet.... from that time forward it is no longer "private correspondence". She should also realize that she shouldn't lie so glibly about things that are so easily checked.