Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

Started by TinselKoala, June 01, 2013, 11:38:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

I don't much care what "HE" might "want" to show us. Here's what MUST be shown, in order for Ainslie to have any credibility:

700 mL of water, "brought to boil" at a temperature of 104 degrees C, using the waveform shown in Figure 3, Paper 1 and the Paper 1 schematic. Six batteries in series, the small original heatsink on Q1. Before and after accomplishing this, all mosfets must be shown to be fully functional.

This is what is claimed in the paper. If this cannot be accomplished, then the papers must be withdrawn, errata issued, and apologies made by Ainslie. It is as simple as that.

Now note this very well. I can boil water using the Ainslie circuit, with MY OWN chosen waveforms, then when the water is boiling, I can set the apparatus to make the Figure 3 waveforms, very easily. The water will be boiling and the Figure 3 waveform will be presented. Then I can prove that all my mosfets are indeed "in tact".... even the one I unplugged to make the Fig 3 waveform. And the water is still boiling from the residual heat.
Is this legitimate? Would this procedure vindicate Ainslie? No, of course not.

profitis

well the main question that should be asked by anybody is..'has any one single human being that knows what they r doing succesfuly replicated one single ainslie circuit before to a point of overunity'..if not why not.reproduceability is absolute numero uno in substantiating such claims

profitis

again im going to write here,the sudden split-second drop in temperature on each oscillatory cycle offcut will result in a INCREASE of order in magnetic dipoles that will result in a INCREASE of magnetic field strength while it collapses thus in theory a 2nd law breach is possible but whos circuit is going to be efficient enough to make use of or even register this extra bit of energy?alas we wait and see.

TinselKoala

Are you not paying attention? How is it possible for anyone to reproduce the claims contained in the calculation attached below? Have you "Done The Math" (tm Rosemary Ainslie)?


(That 25 million Joules figure comes up a lot in Ainslie's claims, and this calculation is the source of that figure.)

TinselKoala

Well. We have a lot of bloviating TALK TALK from Little Miss MOSFET, but we still have NO REPRODUCTION of that Figure 3 scopeshot, by anyone except ME.

IF IT IS SO BORINGLY EASY, then why doesn't somebody DO IT ?

I can do it in three minutes. It takes longer to upload the video than it does to do it. Where is ANYONE ELSE's demonstration? Where is AINSLIE's?

Oh.... that's right, I nearly forgot. She can't operate her own apparatus, so she has to wait for someone ELSE to come back from Namibia, so that HE can demonstrate something -- nobody is sure just what -- with the apparatus on Saturday evening.

It's my considered opinion, with considerable support from her own words, that Ainslie is an incompetent bloviating slapper.

And once again... she can provide no support whatsoever for her continuing idiotic contention that I am someone named Bryan Little. Nor can she demonstrate in any way that I "have no aptitudes". Contrariwise, I am highly apt, and can prove it. I will happily submit to aptitude testing alongside Ainslie herself. Let's start with math, shall we?

I even know the difference between "in tact" and "intact", between "et al" and "et al." and between "doggeral" and "doggerel".