Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

Here are some results from a sim:

Vbat = 38V, FG peak measurement is +6.6V.

Vbat = 72V, FG peak measurement is +11.2V

Measurements are with Q1 installed and functioning.

And of course when you get that slightly over eleven volts maximum to the Gate, your current trace is nowhere near "flatlined", is it.


This reminds me a lot of the early days in 2009 when I first started working on the Quantum schematic. I immediately found and reported that the 555 timer was making the exact inverse duty cycle from what Ainslie claimed.... and I had to argue about that for literally _weeks_ before the point got across, and in some cases it still hasn't.  Three dollars worth of parts, anyone could build and see for themselves in thirty minutes .... but they wanted to argue and insult and all the rest, instead of simply doing it and finding out for themselves. Then to see Gmeast get suckered in just a few months ago, trying to build her _still uncorrected_ schematic and crying out "It doesn't work" !! I really LOLed on that one.

[profitis]

cantankery vs markdansie lol

[TinselKoala]

The flipped duty cycle story has an interesting chapter. There was one person who actually did build the 555 timer according to the Quantum schematic, and he found that it did NOT flip the duty cycle, and he argued with me for several days to that effect. But, to his credit, since I was so positive with my arguments and demonstrations, he checked his work..... and this is what he found: His original data was taken using a sound-card oscilloscope program, and his HP sound card was inverting.... that is, re-inverting.... the input signal! When he checked his build using a real oscilloscope he found that I was correct and that his first measurements -- through no real fault of his own -- were wrong. So the timer +was+ in fact making the flipped duty cycle just as I said. To his great credit he came onto my YT channel and apologized and confirmed my findings re the Quantum 555 timer circuit.

[TinselKoala]

Awww .... look, isn't that cute?

GMeast, who asked not to be referred to in any more Ainslie discussions, has decided to chime in with his considered and constructive opinion. Which, of course, makes him fair game, once again, for inclusion in this thread.


Here's a suggestion, GMyeasty-ass...... why don't YOU use your vaunted experimental skills and your amazing apparatus to reproduce the Figure 3 scopeshot YOURSELF, and show us all how great a Knight you are, defending your damsel Ains-lie.

YOU CANNOT.

[TinselKoala]

She is just gonna have to show you how it's done, .99.

Weird, isn't it? With an intact mosfet in the circuit she claims to be using, the sim can't do it, you can't do it, I can't do it, PW can't do it.... nobody anywhere can do it, but Ainslie claims that she can do it easily, with three different function generators, simply by turning a knob.

She could show this in five minutes, if it were true. BUT SHE CANNOT.

(One thing is certainly true in her post: She simply CANNOT understand.)

(THREE different FGs? Where is the evidence for that? We know about at least two of them, one damaged during one mosfet-blowing event and replaced with a new one. But the Fig 3 shot was made before that happened. And I say NO FG can produce the Figure 3 shot.)