Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[Tseak]

Here is what i see happening.Poynt will show very clearlywhat was happening and why(just like yourself),but even then she will continue to present her circuit as an OU circuit-she just wont take no,or you were wrong Rose for an answer. I just dont have the time to waste on rubbish like this. I have just started takeing an interest in the TPU-yes i know,late start lol. But tomorrow i will be casting the core,and i have some other unfinished projects i wish to keep working on aswell. But anyway,you have shown that she has nothing,and i feel Poynt will show the same thing.But i feel the heads will still be banging against a brick wall.

Tinman,
You are spot on. She even says it herself - from her own forum

IF there is nothing in our thesis - which is the REAL REASON THAT MY NAME AND ABILITIES ARE BEING TRASHED - then the easiest thing to do is to IGNORE IT.  IT WILL COME TO NOTHING.

She has nothing here and cannot accept it. I don't know why she keeps on - probably for attention. When I first saw her posts I thought I would visit her as I live in SA. However on reading some of the previous threads I saw a pattern repeated. First, pleasant engagement followed by evasive and sometimes provocative responses to questions then eventually outright rudeness and abuse. I analysed her circuit and modeled it. I came up with pretty much the same as TK , .99, Picowatt et al. Since then I've just sat and watched the soap opera. Quite honestly, if her upcoming test is not timeous, transparent and correct (which I do not believe is possible) then it is time to simply ignore her.

Tseak

[TinselKoala]

The problem is, as I have noted before, that she cannot be ignored. She moves from site to site with her initial set of claims (large COPs, a patent, publication, replications, vettings, discrimination, etc. none of which are true)  and the site owners give her publicity, and she attracts a new set of hopeful experimenters each time.
She was being ignored here, effectively, until _after_ she snivelled on the June 1st demonstration that she trumpeted on PESN. She badgers people, makes false accusations and dispenses insults left and right, all the while failing to produce what she claims. It is no more possible to ignore her than it is to ignore a screaming 8-year-old child in a restaurant.

Several of her own blogs
Rossi's JNP
Her own "energy&shiftingparadigms" forum
four separate YouTube accounts
Naked Scientists
Energetic Forum
overunity.com
OUR
PESN
and most recently Revolution-Green
and these are just the ones I know about.

[profitis]

@tk one good thing that has come from the screaming child is she is not only drawing attention to herself but to the whole shabang of circuitry in general,particularly the inductor core,where a 2nd law breach is supposed to be happening.perhaps the screaming child will catalyse somebody else,s success?who knows.

[profitis]

@tk.out of curiosity.what mode of action would you take if you were to successfuly build a overunity circuit?would you run away?would you go backdoors and not say a word?

[TinselKoala]

I see there is some confusion about what voltages to use for the Figure 1 and Figure 5 scopeshots. And no wonder! Once again we are confronted with rampant error and/or misrepresentation of the true state of affairs.

Maybe these images will help clear some things up. Or maybe not. These are taken from the most recent edit I could find, of Ainslie's Paper 1, found on her forum.

My annotations display some interesting features.  Note first that the Figure 5 shot, with a clearly functioning Q1, was made _before_ the Figure 3 shot. This is important.  Also note the difference in gate drive voltages. As we have noted in hardware and in simulation, the lower gate voltage is consistent with clipping and the Vbatt actually displayed by the scope. The higher gate voltage attained in Figure 3, combined with no current in Q1, is another symptom of something wrong.