Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

Started by TinselKoala, June 01, 2013, 11:38:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

In all fairness though, there must be some "negative" gate drive signal happening or the oscillations would not occur. The circuit clips the negative gate voltage at around -4 volts, IIRC, so you will never see a gate signal more negative than that, no matter how negative the FG's offset is cranked. But you knew this already.
So, since the Fig3 scopeshot shows around +12 volts at the peaks, the question we now ask is whether or not the FG that Ainslie used, is capable of making a +12 volt square wave if the offset knob is cranked all the way to the negative stop as is claimed. I don't think it is, but maybe. Certainly my Interstate can but I don't know about the Instek model Ainslie used.

But this would not resolve the Fig3 discrepancy, it only would reveal Yet Another discrepancy between what the scopeshot shows and the claims being made.

hoptoad

I hope you're not despairing for a replication of her scopeshot ..... I still can't find my coloured pencil set. :P

bryanwizard

can you post the schematic here? I saw one in pesn but seems like nothing special.
A typical topology in power electronics that would reduce the Rds_on of the circuit.


TinselKoala

Quote from: bryanwizard on June 06, 2013, 02:23:05 AM
can you post the schematic here? I saw one in pesn but seems like nothing special.
A typical topology in power electronics that would reduce the Rds_on of the circuit.

http://www.overunity.com/13538/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-june-1-2013/msg362311/#msg362311

TinselKoala

Well, Mark.... just by doing nothing you are already in her sights.

Notice again the continuing lies and distortions and veiled threats coming from Ainslie. Also note that, for the first time in ages, she does not refer to me as "Bryan Little".

Also note that she attempts to deflect the issue. The issue is NOT whether I can make those scopeshot traces, because I MOST CERTAINLY CAN, simply by removing the Q1 mosfet from its socket. The issue IS, and will remain, that AINSLIE cannot make those traces under the conditions described in the manuscripts. Nobody can.

PROVE ME WRONG, you bloviating fool Ainslie. It would take you five minutes to do, but YOU CANNOT. You know perfectly well that your mosfet was blown.... I HAVE YOUR BLOG And FORUM POSTS ADMITTING THAT YOU BLOW MOSFETS WITH YOUR APPARATUS.