Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

Pirate, you are absolutely right, that guy Darren was extremely respectful and its a shame everyone else can not be.
Lots of complaining about video quality etc, when all I could see was people trying to do the best they could with the resources at hand.

What you see are people flailing about with no clue as to what they are actually doing.

It appears the fig3 scope shot was not replicated so those who claimed that would be the case have had their ego's stroked and been proven correct.

You really are missing the point, but that's not surprising since you are a newcomer to this fray. It's not a matter of having OUR egos stroked, it is a matter of soundly refuting the false claims of a liar.

Still I doubt many of them can now return to being gentlemen.

Whether or not the ladies circuit works or not is beyond my basic education, but  I for one give her credit for her willingness to do a demo.

The ONLY reason she even attempted this demo was her overweening arrogance and confidence that she could put me, .99 and PicoWatt "in our place" by refuting us and demonstrating her Figure 3 scopeshot. Her arrogance prevented her from EVEN TRYING IT before she made the utter fool of herself, live on camera, which she has just done.

Those fancy educations may have cost many £s, $s, Yen etc but manners are free.

I suggest you spend a little time browsing on Ainslie's forum, and then you can come back here and lecture me about manners.

[picowatt]

Yes, a significant current in fact.

Max current thru Q1 looks to be at 1:11:03

[TinselKoala]

Oh look, unlike in FIG3, Q1 turns on when they apply +12 volts to its gate...

It certainly does.


Now.... do you _really_ get more information from a DSO than you do from, say, an old analog HP180A?

I guess it all depends on how the scope is used and how its data is presented.

[TinselKoala]

Note that in the second shot above, the white Cursor is positioned at a 12 volt level for the Gate trace.... and they aren't even up to it yet, but are showing the same current I showed in my demonstrations.... and it only took me a few minutes to do it, explain it, and I even give you interpretable scope traces, unlike what you see in this "demo" of failure from Ainslie.

[elecar]

What you see are people flailing about with no clue as to what they are actually doing.

I was obviously talking about the camera work, which appeared to be being done as well as can be expected by non professional film makers.

You really are missing the point, but that's not surprising since you are a newcomer to this fray. It's not a matter of having OUR egos stroked, it is a matter of soundly refuting the false claims of a liar.

So I should not have an opinion because my post count is low ? At what post count does my contribution become valid ?
You could just as easily said "soundly refuting false claims" no real need to add liar to the sentence as it becomes an oxymoron.

I suggest you spend a little time browsing on Ainslie's forum, and then you can come back here and lecture me about manners.

The first thing you should note is my post opened with the name "Pirate" who I was addressing, there is no lecture here for you and never was. You may be able to bully some people, unfortunately I am not among them. And just because you type in uppercase letters does not make you right.
I really don't care to go looking through the ladies forum, and if your advice was to show me that she can be just as rude then you are wasting your time because you have the right to rise above the insults and name calling, or stoop to the same level.

Respectfully Elecar.