Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[profitis]

@tk..i disagree.the friggen crux of the matter is wether a 2nd law violation has taken place in ainslie,s circuit or not.we are still inconclusive..

[TinselKoala]

@tk..i disagree.the friggen crux of the matter is wether a 2nd law violation has taken place in ainslie,s circuit or not.we are still inconclusive..

NO IT IS NOT. The "friggen" crux of the matter is that Ainslie's DATA IS GARBAGE because her apparatus was malfunctioning or she deliberately had the probe in the wrong place. Therefore she has been insulting and bloviating and disrespecting people for YEARS based on a pile of crap. Yesterday's demonstration PROVED this beyond any reasonable doubt, with Ainslie and her "presenter" themselves collecting and displaying the necessary data for that determination to be made.
There is absolutely no theoretical basis for expecting any kind of 2LoT violation in Ainslie's circuit! The behaviour is 100 percent understood and 100 percent modellable in PSpice and other circuit sims. The only reason anyone thinks it isn't, is because of Ainslie's misrepresentations and bad data!
And there is absolutely no empirical support for any kind of 2LoT violation in Ainslie's circuit: see above. THIS IS NOT INCONCLUSIVE !!

And if you think it is, PLEASE go work in your laboratory and demonstrate your experimental evidence for your beliefs.

[profitis]

@tk the behaviour of a core is not 100% understood and definitely not 100% predictable on a computer.trial and error is the order of the day when it comes to cores,there is a gap of activity that deviates from predictability, even with cores stamped and manufactured with set parameters out of the factory.we are dealing with ainslies laboratory now not mine,case closed.

[TinselKoala]

@tk the behaviour of a core is not 100% understood and definitely not 100% predictable on a computer.trial and error is the order of the day when it comes to cores,there is a gap of activity that deviates from predictability, even with cores stamped and manufactured with set parameters out of the factory.we are dealing with ainslies laboratory now not mine,case closed.

And of course... Ainslie's device does not even use a core at all. So I don't know what you are dealing with, but it's not Ainslie's circuit, and Ainslie has no laboratory.

You are doing a great job of covering up the real work I've done today, though.

[profitis]

@tk..covering your work?ya your cantankering maybe.yes she does use a core,an air core,steel core,ferrite core whatever it is,its a coil i see there.