Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

@tk..well i hope she will give us a circuit that anybody can copy,and get identical results.reproduceability is utmost importance in this game,a clean 6watt-minutes out the source and 20watt-minutes into the water then this case will be closed.

She has given us a circuit, anyone can copy it and many people, like me, have done so. But unlike Ainslie, I have performed proper tests of the circuit and I understand how it works, thanks to PW and .99. You can see my work in the closed "Tar Baby" thread on this forum.

For example, when measuring heat "at the load", I use an insulated oil bath, with the thermometer measuring the oil temperature and temperature data taken after agitation and equilibration. So you can be sure just what I am measuring and you can perform reliable energy calculations using the quantity and specific heat of the oil and recorded times/temperatures. Most importantly, you or anyone can actually repeat my work and get the same or similar results I get. Much of this work is recorded in a series of YouTube videos on my channel.

I have always shared _every bit_ of my work on the Ainslie circuits so that anyone with the skills and equipment can reproduce it and check my claims. I use YouTube as my "lab notebook" as well as to present demonstrations of phenomena to interested persons. Search my channel for "Tar Baby" if you are interested.

You may also find some old videos from 2009 where I test and explain her original one-mosfet 555 clocked circuit. The story there is another comedy of errors, beginning with the claim of a patent, then going on to the 555 timer's duty cycle.... and so forth.

[picowatt]

I agree with the "little point" part... .so why does she promise and tease, why does she continue making false claims, continue to agitate, libel and insult then? As long as she continues doing stuff like making the "june 1" promise, harassing professors, and calling me "ickle pickle" or Bryan Little, I will fight against her, with FACTS, checkable references, and demonstrations that refute her all down the line. If I can't get help from the other people whom she has libelled, like you, then I'll just continue doing it on my own, as long as I have a voice and somebody who is willing to host my posts.
The papers are bogus, the data they are based upon terminally flawed, even misrepresented by her, and the claims and conclusions are false. The papers must be withdrawn, errata issued, and Rosemary Ainslie must apologize to all those whom she has misled, lied to, and slighted.

Here's what she says about measuring gate voltages: (capture from Sunday, August 5, 2012)

TK,

So, even though, from her own words, it is obvious that she cannot read and/or understand her own schematics or scope captures, she has always felt somehow qualified to argue with anyone who can.

To this day, she has been unable to present even one remotely qualified individual willing to agree with her and state that FIG3 does not show +12 volts being applied to the gate of Q1 during the positive portion of the FG cycle.

Admitting that there is +12 volts applied to the gate of Q1 would, of course, beg the question, "then why is Q1 not turning on, as indicated by the CSR trace?" 

Surely she must understand how her continued refusal to admit even the most obvious does little to bolster her credibility...

PW

[profitis]

@tk an impressive way to do the calorometry would be to use a watch battery source which could say, raise the temp of a cup of water by maximum 7 degrees above ambient if completely discharged then show it going to 14degrees above ambient,something nobody could argue with,regardless of what the scopes say.this would remove all disputes pertaining to scope readings at least.

[TinselKoala]

- Figure 3 scope shot - is now a litmus test of my 'mendacity' or our 'claim'?  I am MORE than willing to make this public and have offered a viewing to Mark Dansie who is a vociferous critic of our work and an ardent supporter of Tinsel Koala.  It will be a pleasure to show you all how easy it is to replicate that waveform.  God knows - it's intrigued us all since we first saw it now some years back.

And you have never repeated it since. Because you cannot. We are waiting, Ainslie. It's already nearly a week since your last failure to deliver on a promise, you are way past due for your next one.

You claim to be MORE than willing. But I state with complete confidence that you are UNABLE.

[TinselKoala]

@tk an impressive way to do the calorometry would be to use a watch battery source which could say, raise the temp of a cup of water by maximum 7 degrees above ambient if completely discharged then show it going to 14degrees above ambient,something nobody could argue with,regardless of what the scopes say.this would remove all disputes pertaining to scope readings at least.

Feel free to demonstrate this, any time you like. In fact Ainslie has been promising to do something like this, since August of 2011 at least, and she reiterated that promise for the June 1 demonstration (which she never actually planned to carry out, as you can tell from her posts leading up to the date.)


Meanwhile this thread is about Ainslie, her promised demonstrations, and why her claims are bogus and not supported by her own published data and statements.