Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[markdansie]

Thanks MileHigh
I am fortunate to be able to call upon some great engineers and scientists when it comes to evaluating and measuring. They are very patient with me. I like it when you engage with the likes of John Rohner. Mark E and I were both In Vegas and were not exactly welcome at the stand (when I was spotted lol....must have been the superman suit)
The only thing I guess I do have is some experience and street credibility when it comes to testing technologies. I stuff up as you know (buoyancy motors), but when it comes to magnetic motors and HHo devices i have a lot of testing experience. If you read my latest story at Revolution-green. com you will see some of the experiences I had with so called self running water powered cars and generators.
If I had 5% of the knowledge and technical skill you and TK had I would be a lucky man.
i hope you and TK come over and post comments, we do not judge the stories so we have a lot of stuff there that will get through that needs to be lets says reviewed. We just present the stories, but unlike someone else we all know we do not go around proclaiming they work.
Many thanks for you guidance over the years (and the odd kick in the butt)

[MileHigh]

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the kind comments.  To be honest they are "too kind."  I have the full engineering foundation and a lot of bench experience but it's nothing compared to some of the other people that are around here and on PESN.  I was more of a digital guy and here the discussion is mostly related to analog stuff.  For example I have never in all the years heard mention of De Morgan's theorem on the forums.

On the analog side, I could never design a 4th order Chebyshev bandpass filter unless I poured over the material and relearned a bunch of stuff.  Nor do I have the analog bench experience that others around here have, but I can understand the issues and can appreciate the words of wisdom that we sometimes get from the analog gurus.

But, I do understand energy and I am very good at visualization and it's very hard to fool me!

Also, I may contribute to your web site but I can't guarantee it.  Thanks for the offer.  My "bandwidth" is aligned with my interest level and it's normally fair to moderate unless a biggie comes along.

MileHigh

[profitis]

well i see your replies mrs ainslie and i just want to suggest that in order to bypass all the flimflam of these and other critics please please try the following; put a paperclip over a fair-sized watch or cmos battery to short-circuit it and drop into a insulated cup of oil and measure temp.then do same experiment with your joule heater except let it be powered by the same fresh battery.if the temp goes higher with your device then nobody can criticise anymore(they will but it,l b weak).pls make sure the oil is dry and free of significant moisture(it conducts and electrolyses) and pls do both experiments at same time alongside each other,regards,profitis

[TinselKoala]

Instead of working to repeat the Figure 3 scopeshot, Ainslie is continuing to engage in delaying tactics. Poynt99 has asked her for clear photos of both sides of her current board.... something that I or any of us could provide within the half-hour........ but she promises to have a friend do it on Sunday. Will she provide the scopeshot before then? What do you think? Will she actually provide the photos on Sunday? What do you think?

It shouldn't matter though because as she says, "It's exactly the same as always".

But if it's exactly the same as always (except for the new "noninductive shunts" and the mystery LED and the extra Black and Red wires snaking off to some hidden power supply or charger thing behind the oscilloscope) then it's also "exactly the same" as Tar Baby. Remember TB? It uses the same circuit she claims to use. It uses the same mosfets, the same resistor values, the same input voltages, and makes _exactly the same_ waveforms including the Negative Mean Power that Ainslie claims indicates her COP INFINITY overunity. I've offered this device for side-by-side comparison testing with Ainslie's circuit (by a qualified third party) many times and I offer it yet again, to confirm that it is indeed a replication of Ainslie's circuit and that it performs the same under the same conditions. The schematic I used is EXACTLY the schematic that she claims to be using.

In fact it is such a good and exact replication that, when I posted a screenshot from a Tek DSO showing traces from Tar Baby, she actually thought I had rifled her computer and stolen one of HER screenshots of her circuit in operation!!

So one has to ask why she lies the way she does, in the post I've attached below. And why she's continuing to delay, when it would be a matter of a few minutes to produce the data requested. (I know why.)

[TinselKoala]

well i see your replies mrs ainslie and i just want to suggest that in order to bypass all the flimflam of these and other critics please please try the following; put a paperclip over a fair-sized watch or cmos battery to short-circuit it and drop into a insulated cup of oil and measure temp.then do same experiment with your joule heater except let it be powered by the same fresh battery.if the temp goes higher with your device then nobody can criticise anymore(they will but it,l b weak).pls make sure the oil is dry and free of significant moisture(it conducts and electrolyses) and pls do both experiments at same time alongside each other,regards,profitis

How does this test Ainslie's claim of COP INFINITY, or that her batteries don't discharge, or that she can make the Figure 3 scopeshot with the circuit claimed and operating mosfets? It doesn't. It's another one of your suggested experiments for _somebody else_ to do. Why don't you do what I and .99 and many others have done: build the circuit or simulate it in software _yourself_ and perform _your own_ tests. You might learn some things by doing so.
Sorry to be so blunt, but Ainslie has a long history of not doing what people suggest, and she is incompetent to perform your test anyway. She thinks taking the temperature "over" a resistor is good enough for doing energy calculations -- just look at her calculation upon which her claims are based. She doesn't even measure the temperature of the water, she reads 104 C on her thermocouple directly attached "over" or rather to the heating element, then she proceeds to calculate the energy, using the specific heat of water,  based on the fiction that all the water was heated to 104 C.
(And she doesn't even get the math right on _that_.)