Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

Replicators that I know about:

Simulations in PSpice and other circuit sims:
poynt99, cheeseburger/humbugger: these two have simmed the circuit and many variations and have explained in detail several times to Ainslie just what is and what is not happening in the circuit. I think .99 may also be working on a hardware rep.

Actual hardware builds:
FuzzyTomCat, who was a collaborator with her at one time, has done more work on this circuit in hardware than anyone I can think of and wrote a paper "with" Ainslie about the work. He has reported some OU measurements at certain times but never saw anything like what Ainslie claims, and is now among her strongest detractors.
Harvey, another member of the team with FTC, and now also in her bad graces. He doesn't talk much but I know he doesn't support her.
Ashtweth and Aaron from Energetic Forum. Again, both were enthusiastic early supporters. Now.... not.
And of course Little old me, TinselKoala, starting with the one-transistor version in 2009 and continuing on to Tar Baby.
Others, like picowatt and perhaps Mark Euthanasius may have the parts and test equipment but haven't said anything about actual builds or sims, but have contributed immensely to the theoretical and practical understanding of the circuit.
GMeast (sorry, it is relevant) examined her 5-transistor circuit and rejected it out of hand and decided to try replicating the original Quantum circuit instead, and immediately found the problem with the 555 timer circuit. His "Has anyone built this? It doesn't work" post is a classic item in the Ainslie chronicle. Now he wishes to be completely disassociated from Ainslie, so we won't talk about him again, except to point out that he has his own thing, it doesn't resemble Ainslie's except that it uses a switching mosfet, and he has never "endorsed" Ainslie's claims.

If I've left anyone out, please let me know, I would really like to have a complete list of Ainslie replicators and their findings. I would especially like to hear from anyone who has built the hardware and can _confirm_ her claims, especially the claims about the Figure 3 scopeshot.

EDITED to add Groundloop to the list of hardware builders.... see his post, with pics, below!!

[powercat]

I never built Rosemary's circuit, but I watched for many years as countless people fail to match her claims of OU and in time it became clear to me that this woman is deluded, and lives in permanent denial of reality.


I admire TK and others for their continuing determination on exposing this fraudulent claim for all to see.

[Groundloop]

Replicators that I know about:

Simulations in PSpice and other circuit sims:
poynt99, cheeseburger/humbugger: these two have simmed the circuit and many variations and have explained in detail several times to Ainslie just what is and what is not happening in the circuit. I think .99 may also be working on a hardware rep.

Actual hardware builds:
FuzzyTomCat, who was a collaborator with her at one time, has done more work on this circuit in hardware than anyone I can think of and wrote a paper "with" Ainslie about the work. He has reported some OU measurements at certain times but never saw anything like what Ainslie claims, and is now among her strongest detractors.
Harvey, another member of the team with FTC, and now also in her bad graces. He doesn't talk much but I know he doesn't support her.
Ashtweth and Aaron from Energetic Forum. Again, both were enthusiastic early supporters. Now.... not.
And of course Little old me, TinselKoala, starting with the one-transistor version in 2009 and continuing on to Tar Baby.
Others, like picowatt and perhaps Mark Euthanasius may have the parts and test equipment but haven't said anything about actual builds or sims, but have contributed immensely to the theoretical and practical understanding of the circuit.
GMeast (sorry, it is relevant) examined her 5-transistor circuit and rejected it out of hand and decided to try replicating the original Quantum circuit instead, and immediately found the problem with the 555 timer circuit. His "Has anyone built this? It doesn't work" post is a classic item in the Ainslie chronicle. Now he wishes to be completely disassociated from Ainslie, so we won't talk about him again, except to point out that he has his own thing, it doesn't resemble Ainslie's except that it uses a switching mosfet, and he has never "endorsed" Ainslie's claims.

If I've left anyone out, please let me know, I would really like to have a complete list of Ainslie replicators and their findings. I would especially like to hear from anyone who has built the hardware and can _confirm_ her claims, especially the claims about the Figure 3 scopeshot.

TK,

I did spend approx. 4000,- Norwegian Kr. on designing a PCB for the first 555 based switching circuit. I did give away
those PCBs for free. I have also tested the newest variant of the two MOSFET circuit. I did explain why the circuit
did oscillate, when a negative voltage was provided by the function generator on the circuit trigger input. I also did
an analysis of the bias currents in the non-oscillating and oscillating mode. In all my tests of the 555 based circuit, and
the newer two MOSFET version circuit, I never found any evidence of free energy or over unity performance.

GL.

[profitis]

@tk this is precisely why im recommending she quickly build a circuit to match my watch battery experiment,which if successful will be plain to see to the ruthless scientists,physicists,garden boys,electrical engineers,tennis players,footballers,you name it.it is doomed to failure if she does not do this due to all the criticism from electrical engineers(which are the first people that must be silenced by impressive awe in this case) look at the karpen pile for example,it has relentlessly withstood all criticism,the thing keeps flushing out the same level of power while evrybody runs around confused as to the origins of the power,and they,re free to replicate all they want. An electrical engineer such as yourself will know when he sees an anomaly but even if you did see one tk you would have no choice but to adjust your experiment for the rest of us out here or be destroyed by the garden boy or the thermodynamicist etc. An overunity claimant must push against an entropy of people as well as energy.   

[profitis]

the fundamental theory around a 2nd law breach on a collapsing magnetic field is not entirely without merrit in my opinion but it seems the stumbling block with the vast majority here are to match circuit efficiency with core parameters in order to make use of the small bit of ambient heat over-intake in the core, thats the stumbling block number 1 it seems.stumbling block 2 is to adequately represent this to a broad spectrum of people,with and without knowledge in the art.you guys have no choice but to overcome these blocks to ensure a success.