Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[picowatt]

Hi PW.

I recall the figure you were referring to, however that wasn't what I was trying to post there. 

If you really want me to dig that scope shot up, let me know and I will look for it.

.99,

Not really, I just thought that was what you were looking for.

The capture in your previous post was deemed just plain wierd, if I recall.

Not sure what the disposition was regarding its "wierdness".  Possibly this was a capture using the earlier FG and possibly it had sustained some damage to its circuitry.  Do I recall correctly that she mentioned needing to swap FG's at one point because one gave up?

PW

[picowatt]

Ah, is this the one?

.99,

Yep, that's the one.  Recall that you annotated that capture in response to her stating that the "offset" numbers somehow needed to be calculated in to the readings.  Also note that a few posts back on her site, she again states that Donny (reeoneously) assures her that the offset numbers do need to to be factored in.

It appears, even now, she cannot admit that in FIG3, during the positive portion of the FG cycle, there is +12volts being applied to the gate of Q1, and that Q1 is not turning on as it should.

I just don't understand what she believes is to be gained by continuing to deny the obvious.

Why can't she just admit that there was a problem with Q1 during the indicated tests, perform new tests, correct the papers and move on?

Had she done so soon after this was brought to her attention, she may have retained some semblance of credibility.

PW   

[TinselKoala]

Here is a Feb 2011 scope shot from Rose that I had annotated with a question; why no current if the SW is ON?

The wave forms are quite close, but I'm not sure why the FG signal appears so poorly formed. Even if Q1 was intact, it is doubtful there is enough Gate drive in this scope shot to turn it ON.

This shot that you have reproduced is SCRN0184. It was almost certainly produced with a triangle ramp gate signal, perhaps tilted to a sawtooth waveform, with offset applied and yes, the transistor will only turn on at the very tip of the sawtooth. Here's a video showing very similar traces from Tar Baby using a triangle ramp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xs_ZsGhK9o
(except of course all my mosfets are known to be working.)

Here's SCRN0183: I think there's enough gate amplitude here to turn Q1 on definitely at the peak of the sawtooth gate signal but it doesn't appear to be doing so.
And SCRN0243, referred to in the video.

[TinselKoala]

Here's the "locked" thread :
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/

[TinselKoala]

Now Ainslie is lying about the scopeshots we've been posting, claiming that she never posted them and that MrSean2k and I have somehow obtained them from her computer without authorization. This accusation coming from her is Yet Another Libel that she cannot support with a shred of evidence. SHE POSTED EVERY ONE OF THOSE SCOPESHOTS HERSELF and the proof is easy to find.

I've attached just a few of the proofs below. Many more can be found in the several locked threads, if Ainslie hasn't managed to edit them away. Her scope saves the screens as .bmp files, and of course Stefan doesn't allow them because they can be very large. So what did the mendacious and ignorant Ainslie do? She simply changed the file extension from .bmp to .jpg --- without actually converting the files. This got them past the upload filter, and the forum does display them in-line, but when you download them they won't open, because they aren't jpegs! You have to change the filename back to .bmp so that your image software will load them properly. It's yet another example of Ainslie's ignorance and mendacity, changing file extensions, sneaking .bmp files past Stefan's filter and lying about what they actually are.

I'm tired of doing Ainslie's homework for her. As I have said before, if she has a specific scopeshot that she claims not to have posted, let her specify it and I will show exactly where I got it. I made this same offer months ago when she first started lying about not having posted these shots and accusing me of "rifling" her computers.

Ainslie needs to get a grip on herself, stop these insane libels, APOLOGIZE for making them, and withdraw all the false claims she's made over the years! Especially the mendacious and errorfilled daft manuscripts!


Further, since she has now had well over a week to produce the proof that she says is so easy to do-- the proof that she can reproduce the Figure 3 scopeshot as claimed with all mosfets functional, etc--- but has not been able to manage it, we can conclude that she can't do it, that I am right and she is wrong (yet again, time after time), and we will be expecting those errata notices and apologies forthwith. Especially since I've already posted 2 comprehensive video explanations/demonstrations explaining and illustrating the issue, along with duplicating the Current and Gate traces in the Figure 3 scopeshot and showing the difference between functioning and missing mosfets in the Q1 position.