Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

For perfect clarity - 3 Amps are NOT going through Q1 MOSFET and the applied duty cycle is NOT 20%.  And since the actual voltage is NEGATIVE it is not possible to determine WHAT is likely to be dissipated across Q1.

Well.... for perfect clarity.... I was talking about FIGURE 5, as anyone with eyes and a brain can see, not Figure 3, and YOU are talking bollocks. As usual.

The more so as Q1 is NOT conducting ANY CURRENT AT ALL during that 'on' time - during that 10% of the time while there's a positive signal applied to is gate.  OR.  Correctly I should state that the MEASURED EVIDENCE is that it's NOT conducting any current at all during this time.

Now you want to talk about Figure 3? Going soft on your claims now, losing confidence? Ok, then. Correctly.... shouldn't that be that "Ainslie's measured evidence shows that it's NOT conducting any current at all ...."? Because everyone else's measured evidence DOES show that it IS conducting lots of current during those times.

Unless it's missing, blown, miswired.... or some mistake in probe positioning has happened. Any of which invalidate the claims.

[TinselKoala]

@PW: Ok... I took a deep breath and tried it with all six batteries. The Gate drive clamping is a bit over 12 volts, maybe 13 volts. The system definitely acts wild..... while ramping up the gate signal to its full value, my computer monitor speakers start screaming! And of course the Fluke goes wild. But I can get the full 12 volts Gate signal, with plenty current in the Q1. And when the probe is moved to the other side of the CVR, I see the Figure 3 trace.... and of course the mosfet is still carrying full current.

The figures below "refer". The battery voltage from all six batteries in series is 75.4 volts (Simpson 464).
In both shots below, the Gate channel (lower) is set to 5 V/Div , direct hookup to the FG with the BNC patch cord and the T-fitting. The Current channel is set to 2 volts/div, 10x atten probe. The baselines are exactly on the graticule markers; parallax causes my rough dots to appear a bit off. Horizontal timebase is 200 microseconds/division and the FG is set to about 1.5 kHz.

First is the "normal" probe position. The Gate drive reaches 12 volts no problem, and the Current trace shows about 1.9 volts drop across the 0.3 Ohm CVR during the Q1 ON times. "Do the math". It's a good thing I monitored the temperature on this mosfet and only ran for short times.

Second is the "misplaced" probe position. I made no other changes, just moved the probe. Of course the mosfet is still carrying nearly six amperes of current during the ON times...... and the load is heating nicely.... and so is the mosfet.

[poynt99]

@.99, PicoWatt: Can I ask you to try something in your sims and builds and theoretical analyses, please?

Simply move the Current channel's probe to the other side of the "shunt". Not the common ground point where the probe reference is connected, but rather immediately next to the resistor itself, just on the other side from where it is normally connected. This point is "naively" at the same potential as the common ground so one would "guess" that this simply shorts the probe.... but that would be neglecting to consider the inductance of the connecting wires between the "shunt" and the common ground reference point -- and also neglecting the ability of the probe to pick up the oscillations by RF pickup alone.

Now.... do you have any more difficulty producing the Figure 3 scopeshot with a fully functioning Q1, wired as shown in the schematic, and carrying its full current on to the load?

TK,

Well it certainly appears to give the "correct" results for Fig. 3 (based on your recent scope shots), but I would be surprised if they had the current probe connected there. Then again, it is possible of course.

In the upcoming demo, hopefully all shall become clear.

[Liberty]

Popcorn at the ready I am not sure what I will be viewing ?
Taming of the Shrew, Mission Impossible or The Nutty Professor?
However I will behave I said I would remain in the corner till it is over.
I wish Rosemary well, I think we would all secretly want to be proved wrong one day. The odds ar against it
I read an interesting blog today that illustrates that point


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-b-alexander-phd/there-is-no-free-energy_b_3499480.html


I wonder if PESWIKI will cover it???


PS when you turned your device of all the sexy blonde women put thick glasses on and school mistress clothes, any explanation TK

I would like the opportunity to talk confidentially with Physics Professor Dr. Hal Puthoff.  He sounds like he would honestly consider real discoveries.

[TinselKoala]

I would like the opportunity to talk confidentially with Physics Professor Dr. Hal Puthoff.  He sounds like he would honestly consider real discoveries.

http://www.earthtech.org/index.php/about

Be aware that he gets calls and submissions from ....er..... ah...... crackpots...... all the time, and if you want to be taken seriously, you had better be serious when you approach him.