Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[TinselKoala]

@seamonkey..the core isnt 'may be the key'.the core fantastically and fanatically is the key,this is what im trying to teach these electromaniacs.im the thermodynamicist who crosses the path of the electrician and says,hey,what the fuck are you doing,do you even know what you are doing and why you are doing what you are doing.im learning a lot of stuff from them and i hope they learn something from me.

It would be a lot easier to "learn" something from people like you and SeaMonkey if you would only show something that you have actually DONE, rather than talking trash all the time.

[SeaMonkey]

Showing what one has done has the
potential to be hazardous to one's
lifestyle/existence.

It is far less hazardous to offer clues
and hints which those who are skilled
in the art may exploit (or at least pursue)
with thought and discernment.

Let us not become too dependent upon
the "show and tell" disinfo which is far
too abundant on youtube and many of
the forums.

The circuit in question has proven to be
flawed and its dissection into bits of
meticulously detailed minutia has not
accomplished much more than honing
the technical and analytical skills of those
who delve into exact replication.  While
that can be said to be a positive development,
there is more to be found "outside the box."

[TinselKoala]

In other words, you aren't showing anything, you aren't going to show anything, and you can't show anything because you don't have anything to show.

Your posts have only done one thing: they have moved significant information about real work and real discoveries, further back in the thread. And they have done it at twice the normal rate because of your hard-return text formatting.

This "cover the real information with piles of bloviation" is a typical Ainslie tactic, much indulged in in the old Tar Baby thread. I or someone else would post some bit of real information that revealed some flaw or mendacity on Ainslie's part, and she and/or her sock puppets would immediately post page upon page of useless ranting and insults, wrong statements and just general nonsense in order to bury and hide what they wanted to cover up.

And you are doing the same thing. You won't discuss the actual issues in Ainslie's work, you won't present any of your own in support of your claims and ideas, you just want to play psychologist, apparently to stimulate a response from me. And of course I am happy to do so, to point out what it is you are doing and why. They say "don't feed trolls" and they are right. However..... maybe if I feed them something that gives them a bellyache, they'll think twice about trolling under this bridge.

[profitis]

@ tk..im not here to show.im here to point. your circuits and everybody elses circuits will yield zilch and be a complete waist of time if they dont violate the 2nd law of THERMODYNAMICS,the only part of any circuit that involves induction that has any hope of doing this is the inductor itself,case closed.this pointer is for those who dont know it.   

[TinselKoala]

You can point all you like, but if you are pointing at nothing (as you are) everybody is just going to be looking at your finger.