Magnet coil cores, demagnetization power and Lenz delay.

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi folks, Hi synchro, i read the pdf yesterday and made some quick observations today.
Here is what i posted from other forum.
Hi folks, finished winding the coils.
Just a quick observation, until i hook up the bifilar oscillator that is wound on only one half of the ferrite bead or over only one of the partnered opposite wound coils.
Using the 2 lithium ion in series and a neo magnet to check for magnetic field poles on coil/core, it seems the same magnetic poles are at each end of the ferrite core.
And at the same time, in the center of the core, where i left a 1/4" space, there is a proper north and south magnetic pole.
This is observed because the neo magnet pulls to one coil and the other repels.
Normally, if two coils are partnered in such a fashion as to create the same magnetic pole at each end of the core, we would have a cancellation field in the center, or two like poles at the center.
I think i see why sykes speaks about maintaining electric polarity integrity.
I should have given this more thought in the past.
peace love light
Edit: oops, didnt think that through, of course the magnet will attract and repel at center, because they are the same pole.
Anyway, will be testing this.

[synchro1]

@SkyWatcher123,

Awesome! You gave me an idea. This may be the final one involvng the

"Tunnel Diode"!

"The negative resistance region (between points A and B) is the important characteristic for the tunnel diode. In this region, as the voltage is increased, the current decreases; just the opposite of a conventional diode. The most important specifications for the tunnel diode are the Peak Voltage (Vp), Peak Current (Ip) , Valley Voltage (Vv), and Valley Current (Iv)".

Let's say we wind the ferrite core with a single wire coil. No magnets. The core's polarity would be singular N out. At CMF for DLE the rotor accelerates and the core density rises increasing phase lag. Now the "Tunnel Diode" which Works backwards from a regular diode senses the rise in output voltage and begins to decrease the current to the single wire core wrap reducing flux density!

I believe my innovation is finally finished now.

[Bob Smith]

Hey Synchro1
So are you proposing the tunnel diode as a degenerate semiconductor (I think Bearden has written about it)?
Bob

[synchro1]

Hey Synchro1
So are you proposing the tunnel diode as a degenerate semiconductor (I think Bearden has written about it)?
Bob

@Bob,

I'm very pleased by the simplicity of the finished coil. I replaced the permanent magnets with an electro-magnet core that's powered by it's own output coil. The beauty of the "Tunnel Diode" is that it can demagnetize the core as the rotor speed increases to compensate for the additional external flux. This reverse voltage feedback feature should stabilize the "Phase Lag" and help sustain DLE acceleration. This coil has no moving parts and requires no external power source. A self energized reverse Lenz propulsion output coil. The Age of "Free Energy" may be at our doorstep!

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi folks, Hi synchro, after making many different tests with this setup.
I have found that when the partnered coil wire ends, at the center, are connected and the outside wire ends connected, for a parallel wiring configuration, a reduction of input occurs when loaded with the 6 watt non-modified led bulb.
Unloaded self oscillator input is 3.5 volts @ .7 amps or 2.45 watts.
When partnered secondary coils are loaded with led bulb, input is .52 amps or 1.82 watts, with nice light output.
With a 220 nanofarad non-polarized capacitor is shunted directly across secondary coil output, input is then .4 amps or 1.4 watts.
Seems interesting.
peace love light