Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[profitis]

if ainslie wants to prove to herself overunity or to the public then open lead-acid bats are the way to go.spot chemical analysis of the electrolyte will reveal all.ima email her this info.

[TinselKoala]

if ainslie wants to prove to herself overunity or to the public then open lead-acid bats are the way to go.spot chemical analysis of the electrolyte will reveal all.ima email her this info.

It would really be nice if people would keep up with events, and if Ainslie would report the data publicly instead of needing it pried out with a teaspoon.

Last year, Ainslie sent her entire apparatus off to an independent laboratory in the USA for testing and evaluation. This lab was supposed to be a battery chemistry or other chemistry laboratory, and they supposedly did do state-of-charge and electrolytic chemistry evaluations of the batteries they used, and they found a null result. The Ainslie circuit -- HER ACTUAL APPARATUS, not some homebrewed replication like Tar Baby -- did not keep the batteries charged, it did not charge them up or recharge them. You will note that she no longer makes that claim, even though it is clearly claimed in the papers and the blog and forum posts prior to the return of her apparatus from this unnamed laboratory. The most she claims now is that they exceed their rated capacity while heating her load... and this is something she has never even pretended to test properly. (But I have).
She actually used this sending off of her stuff as a further excuse for not performing the testing that she had promised to do at that time. The laboratory also explained to her just where she was going wrong, and they even sent her some "special resistors" according to her to repeat her own testing. She has never said what these resistors are or given their part numbers in spite of being asked several times. The strange thing is that she would say anything at all about these null tests... but she did, and now you know what I know about them too.

[profitis]

thats intresting tk.at least now i have put forward a full-proof method for self-charging claimants and even improved efficiency claimants to test their own stuff before throwing it on us.the chemical method i proposed for markdansie on the electric-car thread is so sensitive that one can determine exactly how much lead was burned in a lead-acid system by weighing precipitates before and after runs.

[TinselKoala]

You've put forth a method. Is it fool-proof?

I laugh at you. You are talking about people -- the claimants -- who don't even know how to use an oscilloscope properly, to measure an easily obtained "sample" of electrical power from an apparatus on a bench. And you expect these same people to be able to do a volumetric, quantitative analysis of a wet precipitate from a highly acidic solution. Repeatably, accurately, and with the ability to discriminate between two cases that might differ in the parts-per-million range.
I could probably do this, but only because I actually do own a Mettler H-10 and my first college training was in organic chemistry. This is also why I understand just how difficult it would actually be to do.

OK. I will be looking forward to your demonstration of such a determination.

In fact, ever since you have been posting and suggesting things, I have been looking forward to your demonstration of _anything actual_, actually.


Now, do you want to discuss Ainslie's misconceptions about the way her circuit works, or the video demonstration, or my explanations and analyses?

[profitis]

@tk,,those who take their shit seriously will 1)learn to do it correctly and 2)do it correctly.its for those types. ive already demonstrated overunity and still,to this day,nobody has proven otherwise.one would think this entitles me to display a certain degree of authority on the subject,on any thread,at any time.