Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

Started by TinselKoala, July 01, 2013, 08:17:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

TK and gang:

QuoteIn Fig 3 Paper 1 we show that we can we have a zero discharge of current from the battery during the ON period of each switching cycle.  Where we 'errored' is in the DISPLAYED voltage across the GATE of Q1 in that same paper.  What we SHOW is that there is an applied 12 volts to that GATE.  This DISPLAY is INCORRECT.  The error is due to having the probe reference of CHANNEL 3 - at the WRONG POINT.  It does not SHARE the common probe reference points.  THEREFORE is the voltage reading across that GATE of Q1 INCORRECT.  It SHOULD read PLUS 4 volts.  At PLUS 4 volts the CLAIM PERSISTS.

This looks to me like a doozie from Dooziedont.  As you know I am not following the schematic-level discussion but it looks like Rosie is trying to claim that the ground reference for one of the probes was at minus eight volts relative to the ground for the battery stack???  Plus I think that even Rosie is aware that if you have multiple ground reference clips connected to the circuit, that they all have to be on the same node or very close to the same node and therefore at the same potential or very close to the same potential before you clip them into the circuit.  All four channels of the DSO share a common ground.

More craziness and that's why I gave up.  She is carrying on a fight I suppose to defend her paper.  Instead of acknowledging the mistake and moving on, it's time for another irrational fight.  The same fight has been going on for something like a year.  There are indeed some psychological issues at play.

MileHigh

profitis

dear readers.notice how milehigh and pw always run away when the going gets tough..

MileHigh

I was involved in this silliness for a good two years.  Rosie may still have one of my postings printed out and framed and hanging on her wall.  I even came back for another round.  Contemplate that for a full 26 minutes to try to resolve that in your mind.

profitis

yes im sure.it takes less than 26 minutes to contemplate how you have no problem attacking the weak..

MileHigh

Weak?

QuoteAnd the significance of this?  YOU NEED TO REPLICATE THAT.  Else you have NOT replicated our experimental evidence.

She is not asking for people to do independent replications and measurements on her circuit, she is forcing people to get the same 'results' that she gets.

That's a 'strong' woman if I ever saw one.   :-*