Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[TinselKoala]

I have to confess smiling when reading Steve Weir's recommendations to Rosie Posie.


OMG, the guy is awesome!  He is the real thing for sure.

I sense a deer frozen in the headlights.  Break 9!  Break 9!

I just read the entire reply from S.Weir. He is of course making the same suggestions about measuring points, decoupling, filtering and so on that everyone else has been making to her for years. He is getting quite specific in his advice about how to hook up the shunts with flat copper ribbon or PCB planes for minimal inductance. It's clear that he's already done a lot of work on this matter, simulating and analyzing, even to the point of designing an entire PCB for the whole circuit, including properly arranged testpoints. It would be really nice if Ainslie and Donovan Martin decided, for once, to cooperate in a public test program that actually makes sense. I estimate the probability of that happening as identically zero.

[poynt99]

In case you've not heard, Rose is enthusiastic about my offer:

Rose,

I have the utmost confidence that Mr. Weir has the expertise to both guide and vet the measurements you will obtain at your next upcoming demonstration. Therefore, if you and Donny precisely follow his guidance and requirements at this demo, I will award you the OUR prize money if you or Donny are able to prove beyond reasonable doubt ANY ONE of the following. I will abide by Mr. Weir's final judgement if you've indeed satisfied the challenge.

Your OUR Award challenge, should you choose to accept it, will be to prove that (in no particular order):

a) The FG does not contribute any power to the circuit. Of course the FG ref lead must be connected correctly on the MOSFET side of the CSR.

b) The load dissipates some 50W of power with only 5W or so sourced from the batteries.

c) When the scope is computing a negative mean Pbat, a net energy gain is going back into the batteries recharging them.

d) You can reproduce Fig.3 from paper 1 exactly as shown in the original release. (Or show me an updated Fig.3 that I may consider). Of course implied is the proper connection of the scope probes, and you must have a properly connected and functioning Q1 installed.

e) No battery current flows during the oscillation phase ("OFF" portion) of the cycle.

...more choices may be added later.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2313.msg4724.html#msg4724

[poynt99]

Continuing with the measurements series...

Next we obtain the measurement of power from the function generator (FG).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1ytR1uu8TM

[MileHigh]

We live in a world of propaganda, quoting Rosemary:

Guys - the value of our circuit configurations - both on the Q-array and the single MOSFET switching circuits - is that it shows clear and MEASURABLE proof of a unity breach.  The benefits to this circuit have been thoroughly explored and tested.

She can say it as many times as she wants but it won't make it true.  Nothing has been proven at all.  Poynt recently and accurately characterized her two previous demos as a shambles.

Picture - in the mind's eye - a football or soccer ball as you Americans call it
. It's made from leather patches cut into hexagrams and sewn together
. Those black and white patches.
. Construct that same shape out of crystals of iron/ferrite/steel/neodymium - anything magnetisable
. Where each hexagram extends into a six sided crystalline structure that tapers to a point
. With a radius length that reaches to the precise center of that sphere.
. thereby making a solid structure - optionally a sphere - out of magnets or magnetisable material.

. Each 'crystal' is then magnetised or has been cut from magnets that has a NORTH (say) at the broad surface
. Tapering to a SOUTH (say) at the radial tip
. And those crystals are then held together inside a containing Teflon/glass or some such material
. That can withstand the repelling force of those crystals.

. Then the structure - here described as spherical -  is mounted between two vertical stands
. And attached to those two uprights by a pin bearing or some such
. That that structure (whatever shape has been cast) can rotate freely on a axis determined by those bearings.

In effect, with this design and/or multiple potential variations of this design - one will have created a SINGLE POLE on the surface of that structure - with a SINGLE POLE buried in its center.  This is the closest possible physical construction of a magnetic monopole.  Which is the object of this design.

Right, so imagine a soccer ball made up of radial magnetic wedges.  There will not be a single pole on the surface and a single pole buried in the center.

Rosemary, after more than ten years obsessing on magnetic fields and writing a thesis based on her own hypothetical magnetic field model, is clearly demonstrating after all this time that she still doesn't understand how magnetic fields work.

I think that the implicit message in a general sense is to watch out for false prophets.  Rosemary doesn't ask for money but almost every person interviewed by Gary Hendershot does ask for "donations" and it is becoming pervasive.  I just watched a guy on Gary's last show that stepped into the interview slot from the audience.  He is playing with a coil and has a web site and buddy with a web site and he asked for donations.  I watched him and it was soon apparent that he didn't know what he was doing and he had nothing to offer.  So that guy, as sincere and misguided as he may be, doesn't deserve any donations.

Nor does Rosemary deserve any credit about her system when nothing has been proven.  In fact, it's already been implicitly disproved in another setup.  Buyer beware.

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tR_8f0DYK5s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yC00JL7kuE