Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

Started by TinselKoala, July 01, 2013, 08:17:22 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

@MH:

She is STILL at it! Look at how she insults and lies!

The persons who are ABSOLUTELY REFUSING to carry on a scientific dialog on these matters are only ROSEMARY AINSLIE AND DONOVAN MARTIN!!

They still have not even released the simple, six scope captures that S.Weir guided them through.... the only possible actual scientific products of the June 28 "demonstration". And they refuse even to consider scientific experimental exploration of the operation of their apparatus, as the events of the past month amply illustrate.

A true EXPERIMENT, as you know MileHigh, involves the experimenter varying an Independent variable and looking at the effect of this variation on one or more Dependent variables, in a systematic manner. The experiment should be designed to test a specific hypothesis and should be in principle able to produce results that falsify the hypothesis. This is the heart and soul of the Scientific Method.

Like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PitNm44_bE

And I am more than happy to continue to refer to the "work" of DONOVAN MARTIN and ROSEMARY AINSLIE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neME1s-lEZE

MileHigh

TK:

Let's explore Rosemary's "PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE" in a bit more detail.

Quoting Rosemary:

<<<In effect, with this design and/or multiple potential variations of this design - one will have created a SINGLE POLE on the surface of that structure - with a SINGLE POLE buried in its center.  This is the closest possible physical construction of a magnetic monopole.  Which is the object of this design.>>>

In her magnetic soccer ball design, she states that all North will be on outside of the ball and the South will be buried in its center.

What will happen in reality is that all of the South ends of the "crystal wedges" in the center off the ball will result in a lot of mutual self-cancellation of the magnetic field.  So the overall magnetic field created by the ball will be much much weaker than the sum of the individual crystal wedges.

Beyond that, everybody that plays with magnets is supposed to know that magnetic lines of force have to travel in closed loops.  So that means that the surface of the ball will not be a single North pole.  The surface of the ball will consist of a patchwork where there are patches of weak North poles intermixed with patches of weak "breakout" South poles.  In other words, it will be a mess.

As far as the magic perpetual motion spinning goes, that's just more bunk.  Many people seem to think that if you have a true magnetic monopole then you could create a true magnetic motor.  Well, that's false.  All that you have to do is think about the situation for one minute to see the error in your ways.

Going back to the magic crystal soccer ball and it becoming a ball where the top surface consists of weak North and South patches, any astute student in Grade 8 General Science class should be able to figure that out for themselves and come to the same conclusion as me.

Finally, that's why I said in my previous posting:

<<<Rosemary, after more than ten years obsessing on magnetic fields and writing a thesis based on her own hypothetical magnetic field model, is clearly demonstrating after all this time that she still doesn't understand how magnetic fields work.>>>

MileHigh

powercat

All that Rosemary has learnt after 10 years is to carry on believing in her own deluded mind,
will she ever stop to think for a moment that she might have got something wrong ::)
When logic and proportion Have fallen
Go ask Alice When she's ten feet tall

hoptoad

Quote from: powercat on July 27, 2013, 08:40:39 PM
All that Rosemary has learnt after 10 years is to carry on believing in her own deluded mind,
will she ever stop to think for a moment that she might have got something wrong  ::)

No, never. Because she is deluded. No amount of evidence of any sort will cause her to re-think her assertions.
She'll merely broaden her responses to accommodate contrary evidence, by warping said evidence to fit her paradign.

You can teach other's about her circuit so they can decide in advance if they're going to waste their time on it or not, but that's about it really.

MileHigh

So Rosemary has come back and here is her comment about the magnetic soccer ball:

<<<Not unlike MileHigh - who we all know - also occupies those higher altitudes that can barely support life - let alone the hard work required for scientific evaluations.>>>

In other words she is ignoring what I had to say and she has no response.  I have seen that over and over on the free energy forums.  The crazier and more ridiculous the ideas proposed, the less likely you will get a response if you challenge the person or ask technical questions about these strange ideas.

On a positive note, more from Rosemary:

<<<Steve Weir will be doing a summation of our discussion.  Essentially - I'm paraphrasing - we've settled on 'defensible' protocols - that will give REASONABLE evidence of the anomaly.  And the critical feature of that anomalous claim is that we'll be showing the measurable dissipation of more energy dissipated at the load than is measured to have been delivered by the battery energy supply by an order of magnitude>>>

Good choice, Rosemary is expecting to show at least 10 times more power dissipated in the resistor as compared to the power that is delivered by the battery and the signal generator combined.

I am assuming that the battery output power and the signal generator output power will be measured properly as guided by Steve Weir.  That means Rosemary will likely have to change the current sensing resistor for a single resistor and solder it to the battery post and remove the extra interconnect wiring between her batteries if there is any.  She will have to make the battery power output measurement on the battery set itself.  She will also probably have to do a new thermal profiling of her load resistor again.  PicoWatt suggested putting a vertical tube around the resistor to reduce the effects of differing ambient breezes in the air so I hope she does that also.  That way you get a more consistent "chimney effect" when you do the temperature profiling of the load resistor.

Then we can all say bye bye.

MileHigh