Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[TinselKoala]

Nice thought, however I suspect....... actually I know it will not happen. Some peoples ego's need permanent stroking, simply being right is never enough.

Who are you? What have you done? You joined this forum on May 28th. Can you demonstrate some reason why anyone should even care about what you "suspect" or "actually know"? You might be an Ainslie sock puppet, you have no credentials here.

[TinselKoala]

Bump.

I submit this schematic for discussion.

The Gate of the mosfet is connected to an Earth Ground and the Negative Rail of the main battery supply. Will our Ickle Pickle be able to turn on the 24 volt light bulb by adjusting R1?

And regarding this...'she remains clueless as to how the Q2 portion of her circuit operates.'  Not actually.  I think that it should be left to picowaT to explain how it is that the MOSFET Q2 can pass a current FROM the battery through it's source leg and onto the Gate of Q1.

I think it should be left to Donovan Martin and Rosemary Ainslie to explain how it is that SO MANY OF THEIR CLAIMS are refuted by my simple demonstrations, and by their own attempts at demonstrations. Why can they not produce EVIDENCE in support of their claims, even when given the best possible opportunity to do so: a demonstration ENTIRELY under their own control. It is because their claims are bogus, of course, and the data that they pretend supports the claims, is only error and deliberate deception. IT CANNOT BE REPRODUCED, even by them, when other people are watching.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rgB3WlXtU

[elecar]

Who are you? What have you done? You joined this forum on May 28th. Can you demonstrate some reason why anyone should even care about what you "suspect" or "actually know"? You might be an Ainslie sock puppet, you have no credentials here.

There you go again. Why ? Who are you ? Whats up is my post count too low still ? Are you the site owner ? I do not need to answer to you bully boy. You may impress others on here with the way you stalk people and their work simply to prove  "you are the know it all"
I really do not give a flying fig what you think of me. You are too unimportant, however this is an open forum which I joined I joined because I have an interest in the subject matter.
But before I joined I made sure I read the Ts & Cs, you might think its ok to keep being rude and insulting people because you are a trumped up little moronic know it all. Perhaps "brains" you could read the Ts & Cs  yourself so that you can steer your perfect little self in the right direction. What a useless little trumped up bully you really are.
Your little speech about how you are the victim is BS anyone who googles your name (well the one you hide behind) will see for years you have stalked and pestered people. Like I said before you are the self proclaimed sheriff of the FE forums.

I did write the site owner after getting sick of reading your rude attacks. And before you tell me not to read what you write, I have an interest in the matter, but would rather skip your rudeness. Perhaps the owner should moderate your posts until you learn some common manners you trumped up idiot.

[elecar]

Everyone else please excuse my outburst, but please allow me to explain why I am pissed.


Today I read Markdansie's post  (Reply # 71)  here is the full post.

Apart from another test for the curious,  I think it is time to pack this one up.
I feel the outcome is clear and definitive. TK, you were always correct and I do not know anyone who would question that after the demo
You are held in much higher esteem than you give yourself credit for. I also applaud Ponty99
I really think its about the ability to move on with grace. A lot of bad blood was split, and its time to leave the battle field...move on.
Go read this letter, I thought it said it out well in reflecting perhaps how we should all behave in the future.


http://revolution-green.com/2013/07/05/the-human-element-of-original-thought/


Next Month is Mr Wayne.......stay tuned.

As you can see there is a link in Marks post. I went ahead and went to the link and read the content from a young guy. You can read the full content here   

http://revolution-green.com/2013/07/05/the-human-element-of-original-thought/


I hope Mark does not mind but here is the last paragraph from the article. I have highlighted the part I made reference too.

While I am not subscribing to the notion of bashing any particular researcher, or process, I also don't join those who judge a  researcher based on a lack of education to explain the phenomenon being tested or observed. I simply ask that while leaving the dignity of the person intact, it would benefit both sides to focus only on the science for validation, implementation and not let the efforts go in vain. Maybe Rossi's device did or did not work, but more importantly than the lessons learned, if there was any sub-feature, sub component, or advancement in any way shape or form as a mere piece of the whole that failed, that this component did function and unto itself was original and could benefit the whole of everyone in this spectrum that is be used, and credit be given properly. Wasting time in the arena of egos is exactly that: a waste of time.

My reply to Marks post (post #72) is quoted below.

Nice thought, however I suspect....... actually I know it will not happen. Some peoples ego's need permanent stroking, simply being right is never enough.

To which rude Mr know it all  took part of the post as you can see in his rude reply above and here is what he typed in full.

Who are you? What have you done? You joined this forum on May 28th. Can you demonstrate some reason why anyone should even care about what you "suspect" or "actually know"? You might be an Ainslie sock puppet, you have no credentials here.

So you see I was addressing a post and a link provided by MarkDansie, but the moron decided it was all about him, I suppose because he is one of those who needs his ego stroked.

You will note how he expects apologies from those who have been rude to him, however I do not suppose I should expect the same from the idiot who deliberately misrepresented what I wrote to make it appear like it was all about him again. He really is unimportant to me so I have no idea apart from the size of his ego why he would think I did anything to smite him, that I deserved to be spoken to the way he did to me.

Respectfully Elecar

[TinselKoala]

"Respectfully Elecar"

Hypocrite.
Just like all the rest of your ilk, you cannot refute me with facts references or demonstrations of your own, so you spew your filth and insults freely, while you criticize what you cannot understand.

Would you like to discuss Ainslie and Martin's latest sets of errors and mendacity and insults, or do you just want to continue your trolling? I know the answer.