Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[TinselKoala]

Here are the four parts all together, along with re-drawn schematics that should make it very plain how the parts relate to the Ainslie circuit. A Part 5 is planned which will add the second transistor to complete the circuit and the illustrations of its behaviour.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rgB3WlXtU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i0DziLllc0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vm2ZTDUyyA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jENARrROGs

[TinselKoala]

Well, it has been a week since Ainslie's demonstration. As I write this it is Sunday evening in CPT, so it has been a week and a day for them.

Where are the scope captures that were made under the direction of S.Weir? Why have they not been released by the Ainslie team?

Why is Donovan Martin not making himself available for discussion? He has a lot of responsibility for the entire Ainslie affair and particularly for the events of last Saturday. Why is he leaving Ainslie, a poor old woman without technical training or even the language of electrical engineering, out in the cold all by herself to try to answer questions and criticisms?

There is much more going on with this Ainslie affair than meets the eye. Saturday's demonstration, and the events afterwards, are ample proof of that much at least.

But whatever it is, certainly it is Very Suspicious, and unconscionable, for them not to have released those screen captures immediately while events were still fresh in everyone's minds and could be discussed properly. Fortunately we have the video segment that preserves the making of the captures, thanks to the Ainslie team.

Wait..... we have the video segment, NO thanks to the Ainslie team.

[TinselKoala]

OK, baby, if I have to pry it out with a teaspoon... so be it.

I reviewed the video clip segment where S.Weir guides Donovan Martin through the proper settings to make meaningful scope displays and they make the captures of the significant data sets. Here's the video, my "capture captions" describing the conditions of the captures, and the best images I could get from my computer's screenshot taking an image of the YouTube viewer showing the web stream from Ainslie's cellphone camera image of the LeCroy scope screen.  The images are good enough to show the utter and complete refutation of Ainslie's claims wrt Figures 3, 6 and 7. Those figures were not obtained under the conditions claimed in the papers. Probe "cheats" could have fully accounted for the paper's scopeshots, but when the stated conditions and settings and correct probe positions are used, very different traces result.

The timestamps in the lower left of each image refer to the video clip linked below.

S.Weir Capture 1: FG Offset raised to stop Q2 oscillations, Amplitude raised to 8V. Current trace at 4 amps/divison.

S.Weir Capture 2: FG Offset lowered to make Q2 oscillations, Amplitude raised back up to 8.75 V. Current is high, Ainslie can be heard to say that something (load?) is "quite hot" and it's clear they are worried about overheating something. Weir offers cooldown time if needed.

S.Weir Capture 3: As above but Current probe moved to the other side ("ground" side) of the Current Sense Resistor (shunt). Note the "Figure 3" type traces. Even though we know that there is massive current flowing, the trace has dropped to zero just like Figure 3.

S.Weir (TK) Capture 4: As above, current probe moved back to normal location. (S.Weir didn't make a capture here but I did.)

S.Weir Capture 5: As above, but with Gate drive voltage raised to 11.9 V (per Donovan Martin audio). Note high current reading in the top trace.

S.Weir Capture 6: As above, but with Current probe moved to the other side of the Current Sense Resistor (shunt) as in Capture 3. Note the exact correspondence to the Figure 3 traces in Paper 1.

At this point S.Weir asks, "Rosemary do you have any questions about what we've been doing here?" and Ainslie says, "No, it's beginning to make very good sense to me, I've seen what's happening."

S.Weir Capture 7: Current probe on correct side of CSR. FG Amplitude lowered to just below Q1 oscillation point, then offset lowered to re-establish Q2 oscillations, then amplitude raised to just below Q1 oscillation point.

Now S. Weir tells the team that they should 1) Publish the "change" in the schematic, that is, the True location of the FG's Black output lead. 2) Publish the scope captures and the conditions under which they were made. (There should only be six captures forthcoming from the Donovan Martin team, my count is increased by the one that I added to the mix as number 4.)

(It is important to note here that the True location as shown here in this video is the ONLY location that Ainslie has ever actually shown for the Black FG output lead. It is at the common circuit ground in every photograph and every video that exists, even the first single-mosfet apparatus has it here. The schematic in the papers only appeared _after_ the current bypass situation that S.Weir describes in the video clip, was explained to Ainslie back in 2011. As far as I am aware the hookup in the paper's schematic has never actually been used by the Ainslie team. So when Donny at 12:05 actually says a remarkable sentence containing the word "actually" four times.... saying "that's actually been amended somewhat"... is actually an astounding statement, isn't it actually? Since it's not an "amendment" at all, the present state is as it has always been, and it's not "somewhat", it is completely different from what is shown in the schematic and has profound effects on the data. In other words his remarkable statement is another bald-faced lie.)

Now the flailing begins on Rosemary's part, as she and S. Weir are trying to agree on what was observed and how it relates to what she claims in the papers.

At any rate, here are the screen captures that the Ainslie-Martin team should have released seven days ago. Too bad you can't see the actual scope captures and have to put up with a screenshot of a cellphone webcast from a YouTube viewer. Isn't it.

A Quote from S. Weir that should be burned in every researcher's mind with a laser beam:

"Let's not worry about explanations, yet. Let's make sure that we share the same observations."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAz1Snh75HY

[The Boss]

Mark, I read Chris's letter and I quite agree with him, in principle. But it is also very clear that he does not know the history of the Rosemary Ainslie affair.

For the record, Chris Hunter was daily battling publicly with Ainslie and her circuit claims well over 10 years ago long before anyone here ever heard of her. He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability. The guy is a legend as far as Ainslie is concerned and she still bears the scars of those battles. You will no longer find him posting on forums. We stay in touch a couple times a year and his private personal story is remarkable. One of the few people in these forums to run with his original ideas and innovations and bring them to market. Technically, he is as astute as both TinselKoala and Poynt99. ..just a remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff.

[TinselKoala]

For the record, Chris Hunter was daily battling publicly with Ainslie and her circuit claims well over 10 years ago long before anyone here ever heard of her. He was the very first to call her to account, is well aware of her of her fraudulent claims and her mental instability. The guy is a legend as far as Ainslie is concerned and she still bears the scars of those battles. You will no longer find him posting on forums. We stay in touch a couple times a year and his private personal story is remarkable. One of the few people in these forums to run with his original ideas and innovations and bring them to market. Technically, he is as astute as both TinselKoala and Poynt99. ..just a remarkable young man who has no time for this kind of stuff.

Thank you for that correction. It appears then that it is I who do not know the full history even now, even after everyone I know has told me all they  know about Ainslie. Haven't they.

That being the case I wonder why Mr. Hunter chooses, at this point in time actually, to criticize those newcomers like me who are currently being critical of Ainslie. And why he wasn't able to put a definitive stop to her BS long ago, saving me, .99, FTC and all the rest of us a lot of trouble.

Can you provide some links to some information about Hunter's public battles with Rosemary Ainslie?
Because sometimes I feel like I am all alone in this struggle, like all my friends have abandoned me, and I would appreciate knowing about things I might have missed. Before, rather than after, I stick my foot in my mouth due to insufficient information.

Us unremarkable old men, who do have time for "this kind of stuff", meaning the pursuit of Truth, deserve a break now and then too, don't you think?