Why we still don't have free energy the real reason

[MasterPlaster]

http://aetherforce.com/why-we-still-dont-have-free-energy-the-real-reason/

[crazycut06]

Nice link thanks!

[markdansie]

there could be another reason. None of the claims work and claiming suppression is an easy way out fro the inventor.
Kind Regards
Mark

[Liberty]

there could be another reason. None of the claims work and claiming suppression is an easy way out fro the inventor.
Kind Regards
Mark

Mark, I think you are probably right with your assessment.  If there is not a "new way" or design that could clearly allow efficiency gains over standard devices already available, there is really no chance that the device could produce the desired result.  (As they have been tested and tried before).

Liberty

[casman1969]

Even a blind squirrel can find a nut now and then...
If one invention/improvement to existing technology occurs, then it must follow that suppression is happening. My example is vaporizing gasoline to increase MPG by +/- 30%. I have installed this technology on my Ford F-150 and instantly realized the savings/increased MPG of 25% as advertised. Further tweaking will surely improve on my numbers. I purchased mine through AGS (fuel vaporizer kit). So, this technology is here and has been researched since the dawn of the IC engine yet every time someone brings this to market something pops up to prevent its implementation. Car Manufacturers know about it, Gas giants now about it and the powers that be know about it yet we still languish in our ignorance and fail to utilize this simple (non-OU) technology.
You see, if they can prevent this one small improvement from seeing the light of day for  a century it must also follow that many other inventions have been successfully squelched.
Dis-information  abounds.., con artists and scams fill the blogosphere, diverting attention away from anything promising as we scramble here and there trying to find or invent the holy grail of OU devices.
Claims of success dot the pages of OU.com but still no independent verification of these achievements.
Vapor burns/explodes, liquid gasoline does not and that's the reason why our IC engines are so very inefficient. Look what happened with Paul Pantone. What extremes will the PTB go to in order to maintain the status quo?
For that reason, I firmly believe the grail of OU exists and has already been invented but does not exist in any available patents because the PTB do control the Patent offices and its processes.
We are, after all, blind squirrels and the moral to the story is to invent and then freely distribute the information. Bypass the Patent office and bring any and all OU technologies into the light of day. Money is nice but if it is your sole reason for secrecy and the Patent process then all attempts to invent and/or replicate will be doomed to failure or be thrown on the corporate trash heap. Open source is the only answer and the only way any OU device will get to the general public. When I, you or anyone comes to this forum with a device, hold nothing back. Knock off the desire to be greedy and think about your fellow man for a change. Therein lies our hope and therein lies the seed to improving the common man's lot in life.
It's better to be a poor hero. Notoriety will always follow.
Oh, and who is John Galt?