Smot with mutliple balls

[profitis]

lets take a gadolinium ball instead of iron ball in the smot at slightly below 19celcius room and let it rip,,when the ball reaches the top end of ramp it shold be slightly above 19celcius thus loses its magnetic attraction to quite a degree at that point and is free to be flung far away from the magnets(less drag at the end of cycle).@liberty..did your device use electricity

[Liberty]

lets take a gadolinium ball instead of iron ball in the smot at slightly below 19celcius room and let it rip,,when the ball reaches the top end of ramp it shold be slightly above 19celcius thus loses its magnetic attraction to quite a degree at that point and is free to be flung far away from the magnets(less drag at the end of cycle).@liberty..did your device use electricity

Yes, it uses a small amount.  That's not a problem.  I have a couple of designs (not built) that would not use electricity, but it is more practical to use a small amount of electricity for precision/control of the motor.

Liberty 

[LibreEnergia]

lets take a gadolinium ball instead of iron ball in the smot at slightly below 19celcius room and let it rip,,when the ball reaches the top end of ramp it shold be slightly above 19celcius thus loses its magnetic attraction to quite a degree at that point and is free to be flung far away from the magnets(less drag at the end of cycle).@liberty..did your device use electricity

Then you'd have a 'smuut' powered by heat, or more particularly the amount of energy to required cool the gadolinium each cycle.
That would be more than could be generated by the device by capturing the kinetic energy of the ball somehow.

[profitis]

no @libre.it would be using the ambient,without need for temp dif.a smash in the face of kelvin,s dictat.

[profitis]

@liberty,,does the electric power consumed exceed the mechanical work out.if not,how do you know?