New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[markdansie]

I will be following up tK regards these matters tomorrow
Mark

[happyfunball]

According to the letter she sent Sterling Allan, Rosemary Ainslie retracts nothing aside from 'this particular variant' of her circuit.

In other words, she came up with a thesis which she will never retract despite no evidence of it's validity.

She has that right though, and it would probably be a good idea to let her have her theories, not ask her for any apologies or proof, and let it go.

[TinselKoala]

She's welcome to her "theories" which, by the way do not rise to that level at all. Neither is her word salad a "thesis" in the proper sense of the term. It is a handwaving bunch of delusional conjectures which not only do not describe any new features of the world, they do not even describe accurately the features we _do_ know about. She pretends her "thesis" is something on the order of Quantum Electrodynamics and in fact pretends that her "thesis" should supplant that "incomplete and inaccurate theory". She believes that reading popular science books by Gell-Mann and Gary Zukov constitutes a physics education. She is truly unqualified to have an opinion in these matters, much less to posit some kind of superior "theory"! Have you actually _read_ the papers? Did you notice that her cartoon Figure 9 _doesn't even correspond to any circuitry she used_ yet purports to explain the operation of the circuit in terms of her "theory"? It is absurd.

But sure, she's welcome to her "theories". But if she claims experimental results.... and pretends to be scientific about it... that is where I draw the line.

She has demonstrated amply that she lies, cheats, alters data, gets others to lie for her, misrepresents data and experimental conditions, engages in data selection,  refuses to correct obvious errors, fails to understand and follow simple directions, does not understand her own chosen topic, misrepresents the words of others, and pesters people to no end. Not to mention the insults she slings when someone disagrees with her. So when she takes her bogus "experiments" public and tries to claim things that are not supported by _real data_ I'll be right there, doing what I do.

[happyfunball]

TK, the Ainslie thing has produced a reference for proper circuit testing techniques, and you and others have the errors well documented for anyone to see.

She clearly doesn't want to give up hope, to the point that she'll leave up faulty meaningless 'proof' forever, and will insult and/or slander anyone who gets in her way.

It's not your problem, it's hers.

[OscarMeyer]

Like it has already been stated on record, Rose has made this public statement : "In June and August 2013, demonstration experiments were undertaken in an effort to reproduce the experiments and results reported in this paper. As we are unable to replicate our earlier reported results, we respectfully withdraw this paper in both of its parts."

She is big enough to admit she was wrong in the above public statement at pesn.com.  I must commend her for her actions in accordance.  Let it go PEOPLE!

She has made a mistake.  We have all made mistakes.  Let he who is without a single error in life cast the first capacitor!

OM