New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[poynt99]

Have just spoken to Rose, and she is tentatively going to allow my participation in the dry run Saturday. Rose may be sending me the Demonstration Outline document (or link) which I will of course post here in the morning.

Out of a certain degree of frustration, I have been somewhat glib and jesting over and above nominal levels lately. I apologize to those I may have offended, in particular Rose.

May the day be all about smooth, successful, clear and revealing measurements that all are agreeable to and all fully support.

Cheers,
.99

[orbut 3000]

I don't think the outcome of the demo will change anything significant. Ainslie will realize that Mr. Weir belongs to team troll and will continue to do that Ainslie number. And - NOTA BENE - continue the search for academics who would give her thesis a fair hearing.

[Pirate88179]

Have just spoken to Rose, and she is tentatively going to allow my participation in the dry run Saturday. Rose may be sending me the Demonstration Outline document (or link) which I will of course post here in the morning.

Out of a certain degree of frustration, I have been somewhat glib and jesting over and above nominal levels lately. I apologize to those I may have offended, in particular Rose.

May the day be all about smooth, successful, clear and revealing measurements that all are agreeable to and all fully support.

Cheers,
.99

Darren:

Good for you.  That is potentially good news.  As I have posted before, I admire your patience and the respect you have shown while dealing with these issues.  It appears that you just want to get to the truth of the matter...which is what everyone should want, including Rose, et al.

That is a plus for Rose that she will allow you (hopefully) to be involved in the dry run.  I guess TK being involved is out of the question, ha ha.  I know he will be watching closely.

Best of luck with this.

Bill

[TinselKoala]

Yes, I'll be watching all right -- if anything actually takes place, which I doubt. She's competing with another scheduled and postponed demonstration now, you know, Chuck Pierce's Cleveland Mo-Gen that makes 17 kW for free, that he's been trying to get running since Thursday night.

My  involvement has already been extensive and comprehensive. The many videos I've made over the past two years illustrating and explaining features of her device will be fun to review and compare to what they will present, and have presented. They will of course avoid dealing with any of the Real issues involved, like the fabrication of fraudulent data in their "papers", that was demonstrated on June 29th.

I've illustrated several things over the duration:

1. A Vgs of +4 volts is enough to turn on Q1 substantially, but not completely.
2. The Function Generator DOES act as a power supply in series with the main battery during the Q2 oscillations.
3. The oscillations can be made continuously, with no Function Generator necessary at all.
4. The oscillations do result in a small current drain from the battery and some small load heating.

5. The Paper 1 Figure 3 scopeshot is a fabrication, a lie, it cannot be made under the claimed conditions in the paper. This is a definite and provable example of deliberate fraud on the part of Rosemary Ainslie and Donovan Martin: cooking data so that it appears to support the claims in the papers. The Figure 3 scopeshot has been challenged ever since it was published in March of 2011, and since June 29, 2013 it has been known, beyond any doubt whatsoever, that Ainslie and Martin cannot produce this dataset under the claimed conditions, when they are being watched so that they cannot cheat. The presence of the Figure 3 scopeshot is clear proof of fraud, not error--- since the problems were pointed out over two years ago, yet Ainslie even today still refers to the figure in an attempt to support her mendacious claims. Calling the Figure 3 shot "scientific misconduct" of the worst kind -- falsifying data -- is too good for Ainslie, since there is no science involved in her playtime amusements.... but the fact remains: the Figure 3 scopeshot is a fabrication -- as are the schematics posted in the papers. The Ainslie-Martin team actually used a different schematic than any they have ever published! This fact, too, was clearly proven during the June 29 demonstration.

6. The oscillations actually dissipate more power in the transistors than in the load.
7. Batteries used to run the Ainslie circuit DO discharge and will run down faster in a Dim Bulb test than batteries that have not been used to run the circuit.
8. There is no "benefit" of Ainslie's circuit as a heater, over straight DC supplied to the load.
9. Tar Baby is an exact functional replication of Ainslie's device.
10. Digital oscilloscopes, like ALL test instruments, have artifacts and measurement pitfalls that must be taken into account by the user.
11. The battery is connected at all times during the operation of the device, it is never DISCONNECTED as Ainslie shouts with her false claims.
12. The claimed COP>17 device, and the present claimed COP INFINITY device, both have incorrect or impossible schematics published along with their claims.
13. The claimed COP>17 device in particular cannot operate as claimed using the published 555 timer schematic, which produces the exact inverse of the claimed duty cycle.
14. There is no documentation supporting Ainslie's claims of independent testing and supervision by "BP" or any other alphabet agency or company.
15. Documentation DOES exist from people who have worked "with" Ainslie or allowed her to use equipment and space, all of it uniformly negative.
16. The "negative power product" that is Ainslie's only remaining data that could support her claims... is an easily produced artifact of her naive measurements and lack of math ability. It can be made on demand by devices that are manifestly NOT overunity, and hence it is not support for her main claims at all.
17. She still believes I am someone called Bryan Little !  With absolutely no evidence or support!  I am rolling on the floor laughing!
18. And of course there are the many proven lies she has emitted, like "I DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO"...... referring to the video of the demonstration of March 2011, which she posted herself to one of her four YT accounts immediately, proudly announced in her blog and this forum... and then later proceeded to disavow when it became clear what lies it contained. She then tried to cover up the lies by removing that video completely... but the internet never forgets.

And I've refuted many of Ainslie's lesser ancillary claims and stupid statements as well. The Saturday "dry run" and any Sunday demonstration that may happen will not be able to contradict any of these items that I have illustrated in my videos over the past years. Willfully ignorant, Ainslie stumbles on, still claiming many things that I and others have soundly disproven many times long ago, still making a laughingstock of herself with every mendacious and ignorant post she makes.

[TinselKoala]

How can you lose, with the Ainslie team on your side? Not only do they not know how to read an oscilloscope, they apparently don't know how to read a CALENDAR either!!
Here's what you see when you go to their video link that Ainslie posted this morning: