Ernst says he has the "goods" on Tesla and has filed a patent

[TinselKoala]

Hello ,

although I agree with conradelectro to some extent, a spark-gap has certain characteristics which almost no transitor I know can match.

I will give you here some findings of wesley done some time ago:

http://www.kps.or.kr/home/kor/journal/library/downloadPdf.asp?articleuid=%7B20EB858D-1A4D-4903-8BF1-113BCB3934A4%7D

Wesly posted this link at the Kapanadze-thread page 684, Reply #10245 here for evalutation of sparkgaps:
http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/10245/#.UgQWmFJnSuI

http://rfierro.ecen.ceat.okstate.edu/summa/notes/SwN/SwN28.pdf


Here a very interesting website of professionals I found. Why are these people put so much effort in this technique ?
http://www.electrotherapymuseum.com/SparkGaps.htm

Heinrich Hertz experimented with spark gaps and UV-Light. Scroll down to the level where the picture of Hertz is and read the paragraph starting here:
"In 1887, Heinrich Hertz observed the photoelectric effect"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect

Blowing air into spark gaps ... this was known since the works of Hertz in 1887 !

Regards

Kator01

You are right about all of that, of course. For low frequency (large) powerful coils nothing can beat a properly designed spark gap. But semiconductor technology is getting better all the time and there are some IGBT based coils that are pretty spectacular performers. But those things are really expensive.
Proper downstream pulse shaping to give fast rise and fall times to a semiconductor's output waveform can allow good results from cheaper power semiconductors like mosfets.
I never claimed to have "invented" the blown gap! Certainly it has been used from the beginning by people who wished to avoid power arcs in their interruptors. I am surprised that it isn't used more today, though, and I stand by my statement that many existing coils using rotary breaks would see performance increases if they also used blown quenching in addition to fast rotary speeds.
One of the very best spark gaps I have used for 2kW class coils is a five-element fixed gap constructed eighty years ago according to a Tesla design. This thing had heavy nickel disks as the elements and it produced thousands of tiny sparks between the disks and worked an absolute treat. I wish I had it still today. It didn't need blown quenching or rotation, it just quenched itself.

[ramset]

Number 7 in this series,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmE61u2zUkY&feature=youtu.be

Thanks for looking and for all the Comments so far !

Chet

[ramset]

Here I have a comment form One of O.U.R. friends who is replicating /experimenting with Ernst's work.

Quote,

Really interesting developments with regard to Ernst's series of videos. It's a series which I fully support, for spreading awareness and regaining a focus on the methods - at the least.
In my opinion, Wardenclyffe was every bit the magnifying transmitter, or could have easily become one with just 1 change and i'll explain why.

With reference to the 5th vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bDXyv6n_rA (Preview)
0:19 - Tesla's magnifying transmitter
0:32 - Le is wound backwards to the coil underneath, called Ls
Regarding the Patent drawing for Wardenclyffe (attached), the huge pole thing rising up the middle could as easily be the coil Le !!!
Within Ernst's videos he describes how the top load should be huge for a magnifying transmitter and, that shuttlecock looking thing on Long Island sports the perfect example of one.

With reference to the drawing:
C is the Primary
G is the condenser value (capacitor) across it
A is the Secondary
E is the Ground connection from the Secondary to the actual Earth (see Colorado Springs notes and quote "In this system that I have invented, it is necessary for the machine to get a grip of the Earth").
B leads out from the Secondary to join with B'
P is the topload
B also sits within the magnetic fields of A, similar to how the densest flux of a bifilar pancake coil is contained right in the very middle. That lower positioning within the field of the Primary limits breakout from any miscalculated experiment.

A backwards wound B' would be the key to the understanding of it and the flux field that contains coil A has also to be understood, for the importance it also has.
B' is always taken to be a metal pole and indeed Tesla makes mention heavily of the need to limit arcing, through such measures as the hood - but not everything in a Patent is there, or people would copy it blindly. In this case, the fine gauge windings of a reverse wound B' may have given way to a tall shiny thing, resembling a pole dancers tool of her trade. By being a counter wound coil instead, there would be a nullification of the energies promoting electrical break out, in common with the properties of a Caduceus coil node point. Try to draw a finely wound coil of tall sizing and see if it doesn't end up looking like B'.
For evidence of the down playing of certain features of the Patented tower design (Pat: 1,111,732), one only needs to witness the tiny box of an earthing point shown from the Secondary !

[conradelektro]

Here I have a comment form One of O.U.R. friends who is replicating /experimenting with Ernst's work.
..........

@ramset:

Since you seem to be in the know, could you explain in a few clear sentences what Ernst is claiming?

Is he claiming OU? (More power out than he puts in?)

Is he claiming energy from somewhere? (E.g. energy from the earth, from the ether or from the electromagnet field around the earth?)


We get a lot of teaching and claiming, but what is it all about in essence?


So, I am not asking for disclosure (my god, I do not want to take away the greatest invention since the wheel from anyone). I am asking for a clear statement of what Ernst thinks he can achieve and what one could do with this alleged achievement.

Well, later, once we are allowed to see the famous Ernst-Patent, I might be so bad as to ask for proof. But right know I would be content to understand why it should be worth while to wait for publication of the Ernst-Patent. What goodies will it give to the world?

Greetings, Conrad

[ramset]

Conrad
I am not sure where the Angst and vitriol come from or where the "BS" or other disrespectful
comments have a place here...

Now you want to know the Claims .... the way you have been commenting I would of thought you had a copy of the patent in front of you?

You come along with a punch in the face greeting and then ask "I'm sorry what did you say"?

I'm a bit Cranky over this At the moment....

thx
Chet