Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New Perm Mag Engine Design 1.5 : 1 Ratio (work from magnets)

Started by Floor, August 05, 2013, 08:36:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Floor

I still hope for peer review.

Has anyone done or is anyone planning to do error checking on my paper work, or is anyone building their own version of a"TD" test device ?

                                            Cheers floor


telecom

Hi floor,
not sure I understood correctly how the machine will work...
Is it you turn one magnet against another which makes them to repel at certain distance, where the work of turning is less than the work produced by the repelling?

The pulley doesn't have to be cylindrical, but rather in the shape of a cam to reflect the changing torque or the repelling force.


Floor

@telecom

Yes you understand correctly.  Except,  I originally thought that it would take less force to close the gap between the magnets by
rotating than by sliding. The measurements say that it is the other way around.  It takes less force to close the gap by sliding than by
rotating. A lot less.

Using a cam could even out the forces, but it would be a really unusually shaped cam, and very steep. I think some other method would
be needed.

At this time I am preparing to republish all of the information in a simple and clear way.

I am hoping that others will duplicate the tests, but so far no one has offered to do so.

                                                   thanks for your time and the ideas.


                                                Cheers floor



telecom

I wonder if LE magnet can be replaced by a solenoid?  This will greatly simplify the operation, as long as it stays within your equation.

Floor

@telecom

Thank you for the suggestion / ideas.

I am building a second test device. This might take some time. The new device will be able to test solenoids, and permanent  magnets of various shapes and designs. 

Do you build prototypes?

                                 Cheers
                                         floor