Energy from the Ground - Self powered generator by Barbosa and Leal

[pomodoro]

Man, this threat went Ape Shit and Clarance got nailed to a cross. Let's see what Bro Mikey and his motley crew can do with Clarance's plans over there. Those pole pigs could have another use after they give up with Gerard's delusions.

[tinman]

here is the link for the new dedicated thread [which I will most definitely be contributing to]
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/20091-barbosa-leal-devices-info-replication-details.html.

Chet K

Aaron should have a book out in no time-->the secrets of the Captor Loop Transformer
Only $29.99

[ariovaldo]

Sorry, but I'm in the middle of a big plant start up, with a lot of big medium voltage motors, vfd's, softstarters, plc and etc, and I don't have to much time to the forum.[/size]
As we guys know, I had my hands on Barbosa device. I tested it, I made measurements and I dissembled it as well. Probably I'm too DUMB to find how the device works, but something caught my the attention.
Why they installed a tc in the secondary to show high amps, other than lead people to get this high " amps" and multiply this value by the income voltage and say from there, that the device can "generate" high power?
I used a very good grounding system, close to a lake, several rods and very big cable. Also, through a  friend, I drew some circuits ( PWM's and oscillators) that was sent to Nilson.


Ariovaldo

[MileHigh]

Tinman:

Great reply to my long posting and I pretty much agree with most of what you said.

This is off-topic, but I wanted to respond to this:

Many so called experts said heavier than air machines could never fly

In essence, this is not true.

Everybody uses it to argue everything from magic energy from the ground, to super-luminal scalar waves, to magic resonating batteries, to Dini motors being over unity, the list is nearly endless.

However, it is not true.  It's one of the great gaffes that is used to justify any speculative cockamamie wonder stories that you can read on the forums.  All of those justifications for "believe my unfounded, no-evidence, crazy speculative theory" stories fall flat in a way because they are using a sample story that is not true.  It can get tiring to read it all the time!

When you have a free hour, I suggest that you research the subject and see what you find!

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

I looked at the "captor" and with the aid of some pictures of setups finally figured out what Clarence's strange incomplete simplified schematic really means.

Note to Clarence and others:  You NEVER put some kind of a transformer in a schematic with adding the dots, i.e.; the "dot convention."

I would not be surprised if Clarence was blissfully unaware of this, all the more reason to shift from sycophant to critical thinker.  Anybody at EF listening?

So I am going to throw this out there to interested parties on all of the forums.  Can you explain what the captor does and explain it referencing the schematic and explain it using the language of electronics?

Now you guys, you are supposed to be "free energy researchers," correct?  A researcher is supposed to look at things and discuss them amongst their peers and try to figure out how something works, even before they build it.

So how is the captor supposed to work, what is it supposed to do?  In fact, we can split this into the following:

What is the claim for how the captor is supposed to work?
What is the claim for how it does this with respect to the circuit, and explain the claim using the language of electronics?
vs.
How do you think the captor actually works in your opinion?
How does the captor actually do what it is supposed to do, in your opinion, using the language of electronics?

This is especially directed at all the enthusiasts at the Energetic Forum.

Here is the background issue and it's very important:  If you claim that you are a "free energy experimenter" or a "researcher" then that means you are supposed to think aloud about how things work, and debate the issues in the open with your peers.  If you don't do this then you are faking it, and you are just a non-thinking replicator, a paint-by-numbers drone.

That's an important issue.  With respect to this device, and specifically the "captor" are you a "creative artist with a fresh canvas to work on," or are you just a paint-by-numbers guy that just fills in the colours and the shapes like you are told without thinking?

So the challenge is out to the people on this thread that are interested in this alleged technology, you know who you are, and the stream of lurkers that will check this thread regularly from the other two main forums.

I challenge you to discuss the captor and explain how you think it works.

I will wait a few days to see if there is any discussion.  I am honestly not optimistic.  Typically this is where the "researchers" and the "builders" have nothing to say.  I think that's sad, because in the end, it just means that many of you talk the talk but when the challenge is out there you reveal by your inactions that the truth is you are mostly paint-by-numbers replicators just hoping and praying that the device will work.

What is the deal on the captor?

MileHigh