Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

A report from STMicro, the application note AN926:

http://application-notes.digchip.com/005/5-9794.pdf

Here's an image of part of the first page. Note the STMicro logo, compare to the chip in Ainslie's box. Note the date code: one digit for the year, two digits for the week of manufacture. 718 = 2007 (the company did not exist as "STMicro" in 1997) and 18th week: May of 2007.


Now... is there any further doubt in anyone's mind as to the veracity of my assertion that the chip was not manufactured until May of 2007?

And so its presence in the box PROVES BEYOND ANY DOUBT that Ainslie is lying through her teeth about this box and its history. Liars need perfect memories and perfect knowledge of their topics. Ignorant liars like Ainslie are always uncovered by proper research and logical thinking.

[TinselKoala]

Now... continuing on with debunking false claims and libels: Look at the image of "Neo's" post below. Where is there ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL that I or Mark Dansie have ever engaged in "women bashing"?  There is none whatsoever.

Ainslie happens to be female, but that has nothing to do with the reasons she is "bashed". She is criticized solely on the merits, or rather lack thereof, of her postings, claims, insults, lies and misrepresentations. She, on the other hand, has repeatedly emitted sexual slurs, innuendos, insults and the like that directly attack the masculinity of her critics, most of whom happen to be male. For example she more than once has referred to TK as a "poor little sod".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sod_%28word%29

Here's a little video that Ainslie posted to one of her three or four YT accounts. Who is "bashing" whom, and for what s e x or gender?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUzsCVNXaGs

[Grimer]

Frank, the very real evidence for whatever "qualifications" I have can be found in my posts and my many YT videos. I use YT as my "lab notebook" as well as for instructional and demonstration videos. Anyone can repeat anything I do for themselves; the things I post on this forum can be confirmed and are supported by evidence that is checkable by anyone willing to do the homework. If there is anything I have _ever_ posted, anywhere, that you think is lacking empirical support please point it out to me specifically and I will do my best to correct the omission. When I speculate or hypothesize I hope that I always indicate it clearly, and when I satirize I hope it's obvious, even to you.

Now... let's see if any of that applies to the "known" Rosemary Ainslie. Does it, or not?

The reasons certain people wish to remain anonymous on the internet should be clear to you, Frank. But there are plenty of people reading this post who know exactly who I am, how to reach me, where I live, etc. Just because you don't know me, doesn't mean that I am not known. Ainslie has stalked me off of the internet and on it, by calling and emailing people who she thinks might know me, and she has threatened me, in addition to stating her insane beliefs that I have somehow had something to do with breakins and computer hacking at her walled compound in Cape Town. Do you want a paranoid, unstable, clearly mentally disturbed person with an axe to grind, even one a world away, to know just where YOU live and where you bake your bread?


Why don't you answer the true-false quiz? Don't you need the extra credit? And why do I need to "trust you"? Is there some question about you that I must take on faith, that you can't or won't prove unequivocally? Are you that unreliable that I must be exhorted to "trust you" in order to believe your words? Nobody need "trust" me: they can simply see for themselves. As Gary H. says: Make up your own damn mind.

That gets another rofl.

Thanks Al. Very illuminating.


When I said "Trust me" that was a light hearted quip taken from one of the Michael Winner ads


Do I want paranoid person with an axe to grind, or even worse an axe, knowing where I live?


Certainly not. I had a few paranoid moments myself when Dr Blackman threatened to hound me. 
In the circumstances you have good reason to want to remain anonymous and not reveal more about yourself than a hairy arm.
As for the quality of your electronics stuff but if your exposé of Mylow is anything to go by it must be pretty good.  I presume any progress on the WhipMag is still under wraps.



.


[size=78%] [/size]

[Grimer]

Now... continuing on with debunking false claims and libels: Look at the image of "Neo's" post below. Where is there ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL that I or Mark Dansie have ever engaged in "women bashing"?  There is none whatsoever.

Ainslie happens to be female, but that has nothing to do with the reasons she is "bashed". She is criticized solely on the merits, or rather lack thereof, of her postings, claims, insults, lies and misrepresentations. She, on the other hand, has repeatedly emitted sexual slurs, innuendos, insults and the like that directly attack the masculinity of her critics, most of whom happen to be male. For example she more than once has referred to TK as a "poor little sod".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sod_%28word%29

Here's a little video that Ainslie posted to one of her three or four YT accounts. Who is "bashing" whom, and for what s e x or gender?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUzsCVNXaGs

That video is certainly appalling. I sympathise.


I can see you have quite enough on your plate to cope with without attempting the gravity conundrum.


Sorry I suggested it.

[markdansie]

I thought I would give Rosemary a mention on my attempt to change the subject


http://revolution-green.com/debunked-thane-heins-regenx-delayed-lenz-shorted-coil-acceleration-effect/