Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Thanks for catching that one.

And now it is clear why we take images of posts. She has evidently removed that bit of nonsense and insult and has substituted the post imaged below.

Yet even in that,  she is STILL WRONG.... because she has posted many many incorrect replies, not just one. In fact, as I have noted before, by FAR the majority of Ainslie's posts contain errors, lies, deliberate misrepresentations and insults, and this has been true for as long as I have been reading her posts and most certainly longer.


Note also the oft-repeated lie about Glen's (FuzzyTomCat's) data... every bit of which is preserved in his PUBLIC database which has been linked to many times. Note that in that database, the waveforms Glen produced and were endorsed by Ainslie are NOTHING LIKE what she could have produced with the Quantum apparatus... UNTIL they altered it sometime after 2007 to conform to GLEN's frequency and duty cycle range. Note that she didn't even watch the entire nine minute video -- demonstrating her lack of attention span. Note that she is still making false claims and is still revealing her arrogant willfull ignorance for all to see.

[TinselKoala]

I sure wish Ainslie would post some kind of evidence, like links, for her claims about me. For example, I've been searching for this "humping a mosfet" video that she has mentioned several times as being the only one of my videos she has ever paid attention to. I do recall using some stuffed toys at times but they generally hump each other, not mosfets. It would be very amusing to see one "humping" her claims, indeed. That's about what they deserve, after all.

But while I was looking for that one, I came across this one, from the spring of 2012, when my understanding of the circuit operation was still rather primitive. However it may be relevant to the present...er... discussion, as I used optoisolators to prevent a current path through the FG while still allowing it to provide clock pulses to the circuit. The video is a Little long and it was made before I changed to a better video transcoder, so I apologise for the degraded image quality, but it is still very clear what is happening. The optoisolators prevent the current path _through the FG_ while still passing the signal itself to the circuit. The negative bias voltage is now provided by the 9V battery on the circuit side of the optos, but since there is _no_ current path back to the main battery negative through the FG, there are _no_ oscillations. This is way different from the case where the 9v battery is used, without the FG, and is placed in series with the negative pole of the main battery-- in that case there "is" a return path.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KC4IZA_In68

At the end of the video I express my puzzlement at what comes up but now I do understand: at the lowest offset setting both Q1 and Q2 mosfets are turning fully on, they are switching but when one goes off the other comes on so the current isn't interrupted at the switchpoints due to the turnoff delay inherent in the mosfets, so the common drain trace stays at the near-zero voltage level and the current to the load is quite high

(I made an error in the narration describing the load resistors; the correct description of them is in the Description of the video. They total to 60 W power handling capacity, but they are submerged in a mass of mineral oil so they will be able to handle quite a bit more than that.)

[MarkE]

She really put her foot in a bear trap with that post where she claimed that you miswired the circuit.  Now she gets to figure out what to do.  She should know by now or figure out fairly quickly that you wired the circuit exactly according to the schematic shown.  It is up to her to gather the stomach to watch the video decimate her recent claims.  She can rise to the occasion or be bowled over by it.

[TinselKoala]

She really put her foot in a bear trap with that post where she claimed that you miswired the circuit.  Now she gets to figure out what to do.  She should know by now or figure out fairly quickly that you wired the circuit exactly according to the schematic shown.  It is up to her to gather the stomach to watch the video decimate her recent claims.  She can rise to the occasion or be bowled over by it.

If she had any sense, she'd watch the Negative Bias playlist videos, get her ten-year-old neighbor child to explain them to her, and then she'd slink off into the sunset with her tail tucked between her legs.

[MarkE]

If she had any sense, she'd watch the Negative Bias playlist videos, get her ten-year-old neighbor child to explain them to her, and then she'd slink off into the sunset with her tail tucked between her legs.

One of several possibilities is that reality is beginning to sneak past her mental defenses.    My guess would be that long before she would ever even consider conceding a point to you she will seek the opinion of  someone she trusts.  I imagine Donovan Martin is one of those people.  She might also trust whoever else she might have working on her experiments.