Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[picowatt]

TK,

I think the video you made with the components connected directly above the simplified schematic you drew was your clearest and most concise video describing how Q2 is turned on.  I really don't believe you can improve on that.  Although she did in the end accuse you of some kind of deception, she was at least able to follow along and visualize the connections.

She will not believe or accept how a simple common gate amplifier is turned on, yet she can somehow manage to believe that a power strip can be plugged into itself and activated with a piezo ignitor to produce free energy.

Your videos can be easily replicated by anyone willing to do so, but she would rather waste her time arguing against simple well known facts and save her replication efforts for silly power strip and piezo ignitor videos.

To be kind, something is amiss with her, and I can't help but feel a bit sorry for her.

PW

   

[TinselKoala]

Sympathy and pity are fine as far as they go. Are we also to feel sorry for poor Donovan Martin, whose name still appears on the mendacious and error-ridden daft manuscripts Ainslie has tried to foist off as "scientific papers" when they do not even meet the standards of a high-school physics report?

The time for feeling sorry for Ainslie, for "understanding" her mental problems, is long past.

Sow the wind, ROSEMARY AINSLIE, and reap the whirlwind. You are being swept away by the gale of your own ignorance, arrogance, and sheer mendacity, and you will one day account for your sins to an Authority with whom you will not be able to argue.

[TinselKoala]

PW said,

I think the video you made with the components connected directly above the simplified schematic you drew was your clearest and most concise video describing how Q2 is turned on.  I really don't believe you can improve on that.  Although she did in the end accuse you of some kind of deception, she was at least able to follow along and visualize the connections.

Was she? Then how can she claim this:

Ainslie said,

And yet he insults his viewers with an uncluttered view of Q2 connected ONLY by its SOURCE leg - with it's gate 'floating', unattached - free as a bird.  And he INSISTS that he's switching that circuit.  Not so.  Just not possible.  I'm adding this for clarity as this is still not obvious to those dull witted trolls.  The GATE leg of Q2 was attached ONLY to the SOURCE LEG OF Q1.  WITHOUT THAT CONNECTION THEN THERE CAN BE NO SIGNAL APPLIED TO THE GATE OF Q2.  THE CIRCUIT IS OPEN. 

The Gate of the Q2 mosfet is clearly attached, as it always has been, to the circuit negative rail, through the CVR if used, and to the Black output lead of the FG.

Can we see now, AINSLIE, why it is incorrect to refer, as you always have done in your diagrams, to the output leads of the FG as "+" and "-"? Probably not, but everyone else who has ever used a FG knows that EITHER output can be at a higher _relative_  potential than the other output.

[picowatt]

TK,

I stand corrected...

PW

[TinselKoala]

Lest there be any doubt about the veracity of the adjectives I apply to Ainslie:

Ignorance.
Where does PI=3.14 come from, she asks. Where does V=IR come from, she asks. How does a common gate amplifier operate? She has no clue.
etc. etc.

Arrogance.
Take a look at her recent posts. If that is not arrogance I do not know the meaning of the word, and neither does Webster or the OED.

Mendacity.
Look at the quotation I cite above. She clearly claims that I am faking a demonstration, and she clearly claims that I do not have a connection present in the demonstration, when I do.
Further examples of her outright lying abound. Look at the description of the Figure 3 scopeshot in the daft manuscripts. She lies about how the trace was obtained and she lies about its effects on the circuit and she lies about what it indicates.

Stupidity.
See Ignorance, above. See also the "calculations" upon which her overunity claim depends.

Trolling.
Just read her forum and look at the deliberate attempts to provoke, the libels and slanders she emits without any proof or documentation, the false accusations and the twisting and misrepresentation of what people have told her.

Deluded.
Look at the way she describes the operation of the circuit, the way it is portrayed in the daft manuscripts and the way she is carrying on at the moment. This is either the expression of a severely deluded individual, or a very good actor pretending to be such.

As I've said before, I can PROVE the truth of any and all pejoratives I have mentioned in dealing with ROSEMARY AINSLIE, mostly by reference to her own words and behaviours.