Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[Pirate88179]

Right you are once again. The "Frequency Compensated I Sense" DMM position on the SWeir board is designed to do just that. I haven't done anything with that connection yet...

But meanwhile, here is the overview and raw data from the latest run: 4 Q2s and 48 Volt supply from freshly charged batteries, oscillating mode. I demonstrate the effect of the Snubber circuit on the SWeir board. The last part of the video is the usual timelapse of the raw data and has a pretty loud music track, and can safely be skipped. I haven't yet plotted this dataset.

I'm still using a symmetrical +/- square wave at 10 percent duty cycle, 1 kHz. The Gate signal FG opencircuit voltages are +/- 14 volts but in-circuit they of course hit the usual +8ish, - 4.2 values.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeLRv8RV1DM

The open-circuit Gate signal is shown in the image below, 5V/div:

Hey, that looks just like my Tek 2213.  I am not sure what the "A'" means after the number.  Mine is just a 2213.  Sorry for the off-topic but, I liked the photo.

Bill

[TinselKoala]

Hey Bill
There is actually quite a bit of difference between the 2213 and the 2213 "A", as I found out when I blew a PIN diode in the atten section of mine. The 2213 A uses the same circuit in the preamp/attenuator section, with the switches, as the 2215 scope, apparently, and is completely different from what's shown in the 2213 plain service manual. That was quite a fright, when I opened mine up and saw completely different guts than what I expected to see from looking at my 2213 SM.
It wasn't too hard to fix though, since the 2215 SM gives really detailed instructions on how to disassemble those crazy range switches.
CHeers--- I hope you are being entertained by the show so far.   
--tk



Meanwhile, back at the lab..... what's that? Ainslie fell down the well? Never mind, Lassie, she can find her own way out of the hole she's dug for herself.

Here's the data and a Little demo from the latest trial, with around 25 Watts input from 4 Batteries, and 4 Q2s, no oscillations due to the Snubber being used.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_K3yhNDNVE


And.... a special bonus.... a Sneak Preview of Coming Attraction: SWeir Board meets Ainslie Figure 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5Ah2oRGi8Y

[TinselKoala]

Does anyone really believe that the Great Scientist actually understands sigma notation for summation? That she understands integration and differentiation, when she has demonstrated over and over that she can't even tell the difference between a rate (Watt) and a quantity (Joule)?  That she understands the difference between what Donovan Martin wrote, below, and what she is writing lately as "vi/dt" ? That makes me ROFL for sure.

[MarkE]

Does anyone really believe that the Great Scientist actually understands sigma notation for summation? That she understands integration and differentiation, when she has demonstrated over and over that she can't even tell the difference between a rate (Watt) and a quantity (Joule)?  That she understands the difference between what Donovan Martin wrote, below, and what she is writing lately as "vi/dt" ? That makes me ROFL for sure.

If she understood at even a modest level of comprehension then she would have packed in the crazy crusade of hers a long time ago.

[TinselKoala]

I keep reading and rereading that paragraph from the Great Scientist that I quoted above. It makes no sense! Ignoring for the moment the abject purple lie contained in the first part... what could she be talking about in the rest of it?

Surely there is no problem, no controversy, no difficulty measuring the DC power in a straight wire connection between batteries and a load resistor. It is easy enough to say that the electrical power is X Watts. It also must be plain to even the child's mind that if the temperature of a load is stable, it is in equilibrium, dumping just as much power as it is receiving. The source of the power isn't important, the place where it goes next isn't important, is it? If the temperature is stable, it is dissipating as much power as it is receiving. If not, it would be heating up more, or cooling down. Surely this cannot be controversial! There is no "CEMF", no oscillations to complexify measurement, no hidden current pathways, no secret schematics and you don't even need an oscilloscope or a spreadsheet, just a couple of meters, a thermometer and a sharp pencil.

Now, I realize we are entering more advanced territory now, but surely a bright child could still follow along. IF the same load you were measuring in the first part, with DC, straight wires and batteries..... if that load is _cooler_ at a stable temperature than before, it must clearly be dissipating _less power_ than before. Right? Does it matter where this power comes from? If the load got to and maintained temperature C when it was getting power X Watts from DC straight wires, and it is now cooler than C, and maintaining that cooler temperature, it must be getting LESS THAN X WATTS power, from all and any sources.  Right? Or not right? We are of course assuming that the load isn't placed in the refrigerator for one test and not for the other.... and stuff like that, of course, proper experimental controls apply.

We still haven't had to say anything about the _sources_ of the power. As long as the load is cooler than C, it must be dissipating less than X Watts.  Now here is where the small mind is really challenged, stretched, exercised to the extreme. If I feed the load through straight wires with DC at a known wattage level X, and the load gets to some stable temperature C..... then it is dissipating X Watts at that temperature. But if I feed that same DC power X Watts to some Device Under Test, and the load then reaches some stable temperature that is LESS THAN C.... then I can be sure that no other source of power is involved, because the DC power that I'm giving is _more than enough_ fully to account for the temperature, the stable power dissipation, of the load.  This should be clear even to the murkiest muddled Polly-Parrot thinker. 

Now until there is some valid measurement that shows the DUT receiving an input power that is _less than_ that required for a straight DC connection to reach the same stable temperature, there really isn't any point in trying to explain that which isn't observed. Needless to say, the measurements from Ainslie and her mob do not reach the necessary level of validity... since they are fabricated lies and stupid errors unchecked and perpetrated over the years, unrepeatable by properly performed tests.