Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Nice replication TK.

Could you try a flyback diode across the resistor to see if the Vbatt trace changes?

Thanks.
.99

Yep, I'll get to it pretty soon, probably later tonight or tomorrow morning. I have a MUR1560 that I'll try. The 1n4007 couldn't keep up at 187 kHz, there was almost no discernable effect using it.

[MarkE]

Yep, I'll get to it pretty soon, probably later tonight or tomorrow morning. I have a MUR1560 that I'll try. The 1n4007 couldn't keep up at 187 kHz, there was almost no discernable effect using it.

That will be fast enough with a capacitor in a tight loop.  The 1520 would be good enough.  The diode only really sees the battery voltage.

[Tseak]

So the circus is threatening to close and quietly disappear. Never fear. The lack of attention will quickly bring it back to life.

It looks like .99 has missed the deadline and will henceforth be banished to purgatory. All he had to do was acknowledge that partially defined loony tune tests are valid. Hang on,  he must also agree to the results before they are measured - Sounds like Zimbabwean elections. Also please stop raiding the Cape Town computers. Obviously this is where TK gets all his data.

That Mosfet is tough. It's avalanche rated so providing the duty cycle is short enough it will take that punch almost indefinitely

[MarkE]

What does one do when one doesn't have the goods?  One tries to shift responsibility to others.  One tried and true trick is to make demands of others:  "If you don't do X, then I won't deliver evidence of my claims!"  Well, looky here, Ms. Ainslie is now offering up the absurd position that she will not show evidence of her claims, not because of the real reason which is that she can't produce such evidence, but because poynt99 must accede to her silly demands first.  Of course if he does comply, she can always just throw up a new even more ridiculous demand.

Ms. Ainslie's argument is mind boggling:  She alleges that she won't show her data, because she claims that here we promote falsehoods.  In other words she would provide data that could supposedly counter what is said here if only what is said here already agreed with the data that would contradict it.  It's tea time with the Red Queen.

As we know from her own reports:  Ms. Ainslie simply does not have the goods.  She won't be showing any demonstrations because she cannot arrange them to back her claims.

[TinselKoala]

That will be fast enough with a capacitor in a tight loop.  The 1520 would be good enough.  The diode only really sees the battery voltage.

The 1520 is quite a bit faster but I don't have one on hand. My local guy stocks the 1560, I'll have to ask him about the 1520. I might also have a Schottky that would work, I'll have to check.