Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[orbut 3000]

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Blinded+scientific+gobbledygook/9757736/story.html


This may be relevant.

[MarkE]

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Blinded+scientific+gobbledygook/9757736/story.html


This may be relevant.

It just might be very relevant at that.  I may need to start a publication:  The Journal of Vanity Pseudoscience.

[TinselKoala]

Well, the story is just as I said.

Ainslie approaches various people who haven't heard of her and her program, and she tells them the same set of lies that she always starts with.

The lapsed patent application that she calls a "patent", which plagiarizes the unclamped inductive test circuit found in every power mosfet data sheet. The alphabet agencies that she claims vetted the work a decade and a half ago without providing any actual report that can be referenced. The "publication" of the Quantum article, with its false claims and errors not mentioned. The "publication" of the two daft manuscripts with their falsified data and lies about the circuit used and its performance, again with the Steve Weir- led demonstrations and all of the other outside analyses... not mentioned.

So of course, professional scientists _who are not used to being lied to_ will take a look at the remarkable claims, thinking they have experimental support when they don't, and maybe invite Ainslie to submit a report for consideration and review. But only because she misrepresents and lies to them in the first place!

But of course no editor or reviewer will actually publish her mess, once they have a look at it.

[MarkE]

Well, the story is just as I said.

Ainslie approaches various people who haven't heard of her and her program, and she tells them the same set of lies that she always starts with.

The lapsed patent application that she calls a "patent", which plagiarizes the unclamped inductive test circuit found in every power mosfet data sheet. The alphabet agencies that she claims vetted the work a decade and a half ago without providing any actual report that can be referenced. The "publication" of the Quantum article, with its false claims and errors not mentioned. The "publication" of the two daft manuscripts with their falsified data and lies about the circuit used and its performance, again with the Steve Weir- led demonstrations and all of the other outside analyses... not mentioned.

So of course, professional scientists _who are not used to being lied to_ will take a look at the remarkable claims, thinking they have experimental support when they don't, and maybe invite Ainslie to submit a report for consideration and review. But only because she misrepresents and lies to them in the first place!

But of course no editor or reviewer will actually publish her mess, once they have a look at it.

One of those vanity journals that the article Orbut 3000 linked might be very happy to take Ms. Ainslie's money.

[TinselKoala]

The comedy continues! Once more the goalposts are moved.

Ainslie cannot provide any experimental support for the "battery not discharging" claims of the Quantum Magazine article.

She cannot provide any experimental support for the bogus excess heat claims that occupied her fantasies since 2011.

She cannot provide any evidence of any "benefit" or show just how her bogus faulty measurements translate into any such "benefit".

And we know that it would take only four hours or less to produce valid excess heating results, if only her claims were true.

But they aren't! And Ainslie and her tiny mob of flailing sycophants know it!

So now she is talking about trying to get a light bulb to light up brighter with some unspecified variant of the mosfet circuit, than with DC.... but she can't figure out whether to put the new "winding" in parallel or series with the light bulb!

What's the matter, AINSLIE, isn't that part covered in your "Thesis"? Maybe you should read your second daft manuscript again! Check the diagrams..... maybe they'll tell you whether the light bulb needs to be in series or in parallel.


Let's review: Ainslie cannot provide ANY EXPERIMENTAL SUPPORT FOR ANY OF HER BOGUS CLAIMS.... and she knows this fully well. Not even a simple four-hour data gathering session to "prove" excess heat from the load. She cannot do it, there is no excess heat and never was, and by now Donovan Martin and the rest of the mob know this, absolutely, and cannot deny it.

So she is trying to get her mob to construct and run A DIFFERENT SET OF EXPERIMENTS altogether, with the hope that the farce will be able to continue longer.

But now she is talking about "investors". If she lies to investors about ANYTHING MATERIAL related to her claims ..... on this side of the Equator, that will get you jail time. For example..... if she presents the daft manuscripts to the inventors, she is LYING TO THEM, because the schematic(s) presented are not the ones actually used, the Figure 3 scopeshot is fabricated and the conclusions base on it are lies... and so on. So this will be an interesting chapter to watch as it unfolds.