44 Times More Power Output than Input

[e2matrix]

Found this after a bit of digging ...


http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6823.pdf

Excellent FIND tak22!   Everyone needs to read that 3 page correction and explanation.   It explains it all and I'm even more sure now this guy is on the level and may be good to keep track of his work.   It seems there is still a possibility of COP > 1 from this based on that paper.   

[TinselKoala]

TK
In the interest of fairness..
It is not possible to loop this system as presented unless it gives birth to magnets ,motors and such .
I don't believe Procreation is part of the claim?

Thx
Chet

The video that I responded to showed a fellow holding a magnet on an axle, and it was rotating due to its nearness to a coil that was carrying an oscillating signal. My videos show the same thing, only with more hair, and unlike some of the other fast spinning synchronous motor videos you might see, I confirm that my motor is in fact synchronous and spinning at the rate I say it is because I use two different means of measuring its rotational rate, and they agree. My motor isn't the fastest, and the magnet doesn't drive a generator shaft... but you can bet your bippy that it is generating current as it spins within those coils. I could alternate drive and drain in short pulses: have the magnet spin up to speed, cut off the drive and let the magnet generate while it spins for a while, then re-speed up, and do this in very short pulses. Would that be as good as Cook's mechanical linkage, do you think?
In the interests of fairness... I will wager that YOU could self-loop the system presented in Cook's first video, if it actually did make even 5 times OU. I know that I certainly could. But I'm not about to build the system that he has presented. I will gladly, however, work towards making the electrical and electronics conversions necessary to self loop it, and I think you, Chet, know I can do these conversions with high efficiency. All I require is for Cook to send me the apparatus, and I will begin work immediately.... _after_ I confirm his power and energy measurements for myself.

I admire his construction and procedure, and his paper is very well written, exemplary in fact, and I especially respect his respect for significant digits in computations. But I fear ... along with him, evidently... that there has been an error in input and output power measurement. Without having the apparatus to test I can't tell you just where it is, but the implausible result would surely make one seek for the error diligently.

Meanwhile... have you been MyLOWed again?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYQM8WbCq2Y

ETA:  I just saw the link to the latest .pdf corrections. I guess I should probably read it... again, admirable behaviour on Cook's part. This is what you are supposed to do: seek errors, find them, admit and correct if possible. He was premature in releasing the claim but other than that he gets a high score from me.

[TinselKoala]

Lol-TK
I was going to post those very video's here,but you beat me to it lol.

Heh.. great minds think alike, obviously!

Whats a torsion field? Is it an engineering degree in suspention for vehicle's?

Beats me. Maybe it has something to do with rotating crops?

[truesearch]

rotating crops

Would that be crop circles then??


truesearch

[ramset]

TK
You are of course correct on all Counts

thx
Chet