Roy Davis and Rawls Magnetism Discoveries

tim123 · September 10, 2013, 04:23:44 AM

Quote from: tinman on September 09, 2013, 08:59:46 PM
Another thing to concider is this-if at the (so called)bloch wall,the field is null,then when we place say two 2 inch x 1/2 inch rod magnets together N to S,why dosnt one just drop off, if at the center of the two is a null field?-as the two magnets have just become one long one.
Infact,it is extreemly hard to sepperate those two magnets,and that can only mean there is a very strong field at the center of the magnet-not a null field.

Lol. Can't fault the logic.

I think the Bloch wall - from what MH was saying - is a special case where two * opposing * fields meet in a non-premagnetised ferromagnetic material. He described it very clearly.

The 'null' field at the center of a magnet must be a different phenomonon. It's not a Bloch Wall. It should have it's own name.

But it's not really null - there is still field there - as TM pointed out the 2 magnets will hold together. If you cut a magnet in half in that orientation they'll stick together.

Something happens in the middle of a magnet - and it looks like the field 'flips' polarity. But if you had 2 separate fields it would look functionally the same to us - given our measuring equipment...

Perhaps the magnetic field - current spiralling in the 4th+ dimension - appears as an 'N' to us in one half of the cycle, and 'S' the other.

TechStuf · September 10, 2013, 04:37:59 AM

I once placed a wind up watch near the center of a magnetic field to see it's effect on time. As I slowly approached the field, I noticed time slowing.....then the watch stopped! Time apparently stands still in a magnetic field! It seems to have had a permanent effect on the passage of time in the immediate vicinity of the watch as well, because other watches that come in contact with it, have slowed to a stop as well. I will buy more watches and keep you all apprised of my discoveries.....That is, provided I do not get sucked into the future and smash into a bloch wall at relativistic speeds.

TS

tinman · September 10, 2013, 05:00:21 AM

Quote from: TechStuf on September 10, 2013, 04:37:59 AM
I once placed a wind up watch near the center of a magnetic field to see it's effect on time. As I slowly approached the field, I noticed time slowing.....then the watch stopped! Time apparently stands still in a magnetic field! It seems to have had a permanent effect on the passage of time in the immediate vicinity of the watch as well, because other watches that come in contact with it, have slowed to a stop as well. I will buy more watches and keep you all apprised of my discoveries.....That is, provided I do not get sucked into the future and smash into a bloch wall at relativistic speeds.

TS

Lol-nice one Tech,place a magnet near a time keeping mechanical oscillator,and wonder why it slows or stops lol.
Maybe try placing a magnet near a sun dial,and see if the shadow slows or stop's?.

tinman · September 10, 2013, 05:04:21 AM

Quote from: tim123 on September 10, 2013, 04:23:44 AM
Lol. Can't fault the logic.

Perhaps the magnetic field - current spiralling in the 4th+ dimension - appears as an 'N' to us in one half of the cycle, and 'S' the other.

One has to wonder about that magnetic current you talk of Tim.
A direct current can produce a magnetic field,so why cant a direct magnetic field produce a current?.
Oh wait-it can-the N machine.

TechStuf · September 10, 2013, 05:26:25 AM

QuoteMaybe try placing a magnet near a sun dial,and see if the shadow slows or
stop's?.

LOL.....I actually fogged up a sun dial with bose-einstein condensate once and it took a little while for the shadow to appear. (I kid. It wasn't bose einstein condensate but it did fog up the sun dial until the magnifying glass in my back pocket ignited the cloud and my future flashed behind my back.)