Roy Davis and Rawls Magnetism Discoveries

[tinman]

@ Hanon
I believe you posted the video below,earlier in the thread.
Most here are saying that the spin direction of the fields change at the center of the magnet(the so called bloch wall),and yet the video that you posted shows the spin to be in the same direction from bottom to top???.Then by simply turning the magnet over,we get spin in opposite direction-but the direction of spin on the north end,is the same direction of that on the south end??.

So which one is it guy's?,dose it change direction at mid point(so called bloch wall),as pictures above show, or dose it remain the same direction from noth to south,as video show's?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMoYEQFhQoc

[tim123]

I think the questions: 'What is a magnet, and how does it work'  cut right to the very heart of physics.

As I said, I think magnets are impossible to understand without invoking extra dimensions.

I mean - what exactly is a 'field' - physicists talk about 'exchange of particles' - but that's just a bad guess in my opinion.

Current flowing in a wire creates a magnetic field because that current is actually running thru *all* spatial dimensions - not just the 3 we can see. This includes the 'curled up' '4th+' dimensions. So we get a curled-up current - which we see as a magnetic field.

Actually like I said - I think the 'extra' dimensions are the fundamental ones. This 3D world is a projection from there. Everything we see is a secondary phenomenon - we don't (usually) see the causes behind the scenes. Also we're the curled-up ones... That's why everything in this universe is a spiral...

[MileHigh]

Hanon:

Following up on Tinman's questions, you linked to a clip of water swirling around a submerged magnet when a wire makes contact with the magnet.

Can you explain what is happening in the clip?  How does it relate to the alleged Bloch wall in the center of a magnet?  Anybody?

For Tim123:  Let's put the "extra dimension" notion off to the side for now.  Our senses and standard measurement apparatus are perfectly capable of explaining the phenomenon in the clip.

MileHigh

[TechStuf]

Interesting observations Tim....I wonder whatever is to be made of them.  It seems there is alot going on down at the 'bloch wall'.  Ever wonder what were to happen if someone poked a hole in several 'blochs' at the same time?  Will the wall come tumbling down?  Who knows, you just might become the inventor of the 'Halbloch' array!  Stranger things have happened.

Put two magnets together end to end, observe the apparent field.  What happens when the two are slowly separated?  Note the effect on geometries and strengths at various locations of the field(s).  There is much to be gained from experimenting with magnets held in close attractive proximity.  Study the rapid gains being made with graphene.  Now imagine commensurate manipulations of magnetic materials.

Of course, we're merely playing a severely handicapped game of catch up...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnsta0cwZqQ&list=FL6chcsLXw3o_U9O6Jy5WgHg&index=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRBkF6YsvuM&list=FL6chcsLXw3o_U9O6Jy5WgHg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FryZrDKwv_o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FryZrDKwv_o

They're zipping around doing who knows what and we're still playing with our 'blochs'.  And since we're probably all in the 'matrix, why bother putting our heads down to follow a trail of relative bread crumbs, when the real show is above and beyond us...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRu_-9MBpd4

Had to throw that last one in for a bit of  cosmic relief.

[hanon]

Hi MileHigh,

Above your question about the spining bubbles , this don´t have any relation with the Bloch Wall. In the magnetism findings done by Howard Johnson and Roy Davis & Rawls apart from stating that a bloch wall exist in the middle of the magnet they also manifest that the nature of the magnetic field is a vortex or better said two vortexes. The magnetic vortex has one direction of rotation in one pole and the opposite in the other pole.

From the videos that I linked in my second post I don´t know more anyone because they are not done by me. I am just exposing some curious findings

Summarizing apart form the center bloch wall with null field, those researcheres also discovered that the magnetic field creates a double vortex. And also they discovered that there were two kind of magnetic energy travelling in opposite directions but with opposite spin (one form each pole) and also they found that the field strength in opposite poles is not exactly the same. Thus why I said to read those two books. There are many facts which are outside the current theory. All I know is from those books. I trust their many years of research and their thousands reading to map the magnetic field in 3D. Why don´t any conventional -but curious- scientist make the same readings? We usually take as graved in stone many things which are just based in just iron dust put over a paper sheet near a magnet. The iron dust becomes a magnet when exposed to a magnetic field. It is like trying to measure the weight of an object with a scale whose internal parts become more weighted when a object is put over it.

Regards