Self accelerating reed switch magnet spinner.

[picowatt]

Does anyone of really believe that I'm trying "Hoodwink" any right honorable experimenters? Why would I put all this effort into trying to perpetrate a hoax? You can bet your bottom dollar that you'll get the results I'm positing, if you have the kind of strong magnets I used. It's really not that difficult to get this gizmo to work.

I have not followed this thread or even what it is you are doing, so I have no comment regarding any of that.

I was just reading some random threads and saw your statement to MH regarding the "rectification of THz sine waves", which is a rather extraordinary claim.

Surely you do not believe a simple germanium diode and a rather large electrolytic cap are capable of rectifying a THz range sine wave.

PW

[synchro1]

One more thing; Don't wrap the magnet wire directly onto the magnets. You need a dielectric insulator. This can be a plastic tube, electrical tape cardboard etc.

[synchro1]

I have not followed this thread or even what it is you are doing, so I have no comment regarding any of that.

I was just reading some random threads and saw your statement to MH regarding the "rectification of THz sine waves", which is a rather extraordinary claim.

Surely you do not believe a simple germanium diode and a rather large electrolytic cap are capable of rectifying a THz range sine wave.

PW

I modified that. I got effect first and set out to develop a theory afterwards to help explain the effect. I may have overstated that. I asserted the Bloch wall has a frequency of a teraherz. Then I maintained the vibratory spin of the A vector potential, outside the magnet core was exciting the self oscillation of the LC tank. Then I stated the diode was rectifying the terahertz sine wave energy however by proxy not directly. Got it? Maybe it would help if you took the the time to read the thread!

[synchro1]

@Milehigh,


There are different ways to view phenomenon, like the wave and particle theory of light. They are different but not mutually exclusive. There's Dr. Dragone's point of view on the "Synchro Coil's" kind of output:

You challenged me to prove how a stationary magnet can generate a charge inside a coil. I submitted two Dr. Dragone video's demonstrating that effect.

The "Synchro Coil" is a wire coil wrapped around a permanent magnet core. You act as if it's preposterous for this kind of magnet core coil to generate electric power.

The coil charge, no matter how small, displaces the permanent magnet field, and the recoiling of the permanent magnet field generates a charge in the coil, just like in my Dr. Dragone demonstration. What exactly do you find wrong with this theory? You completely destroyed this "Magnet pumping" effect in Conradelektro's test coil! Maintaining the coil charge could be compared to an inflatable splint. The output over flow. No pressure in the splint tube, no compression on the broken bone!  

Look more closely at what you caused to take place in Conradelektro's "Synchro Coil" when you seduced him into breaking the electrical tank circuit by removing the capacitor from the coil! This would be the equivalent of disconnecting a battery electrode from my Dr. Dragone magnet pump, which I did by mistake in the second video. No output appeared! There was no coil charge to "bump" the magnets! The electrolytic capacitor, in series with a fast switching diode, needs to be precharged, before it can work in the "Lenz free" flutter zone of the spinning rotor! The "Dr. Dragone effect" and the "Cook effect" are synonymous. How could it be possible for the coil to bounce the magnet core for the recoil charge with the circuit broken? Do you understand what I'm saying? There's no "MAGNORESTRICTION" without the capacitor!

I have a right to be outraged at you for barging into that test with your brand of supercilious and condescending sabotage. You humiliated me as some kind of charlatan. I want a retraction of those fallacious test results, and an admission by you that you caused a critical malfunction followed by an apology! I hope Conradelektro can understand how radical a departure your alteration was from my original design. This coil deserves a retest! Furthermore, I don't want any additional interference from you!

[synchro1]

Here's the "Old Scientist" tuning a bifilar coil LC tank with a variable air capacitor:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CcxJogghxY

He concludes that a bifilar coil has strong harmonics but is not influenced in the same way a standard or
parallel LC tank circuit would be, due to the resonance between capacitor and the self capacitance of the coil.

In other words, the additional resonance between the capacitor and the self capacitance of the series bifilar LC tank creates a "Self stabilizing" feature not found in the normal LC tank.